PRAKTEK SIDANG CEPAT DI LUAR ATURAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DEMI EFISIENSI PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA MALANG

Authors

  • zainul majdi
  • Khoirul Asfiyak Universitas Islam Malang
  • Moh. Muslim Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jas.v2i2.8712

Abstract

Background: the Religius courts of Malang city is a Judicial Instution that intended for Muslims in seeking justice because Malang Including areas with high cases than that was the background of rapid trial in addition it is also influenced by deficiencies related to limited courtroom and a small number of judges and in the trial practice there is something new, namely the trial process by examining two direct witnesses without being summoned one by one and related to the legal status of the decision in a speedy hearing, it is valid and legally binding. Methods: In this study using descriptive research with qualitative methods that are more inclined to the analysis. The data collection process was carried out in several ways, namely by Interviewing, Documentation and Observation with 4 research subjects. Results: The results of the study showed that there was a fast trial practice in the Malang Religious Court related to the background, practice and legal status of the verdict in the trial with the fast system. Conclusions: the conclusions include the reasons behind the quick trial, their practice and the legal status of the decisions in them.

Keywords: Background, Practice, Legal Status of the Verdict in a quick trial

References

Achmad Faisol, Politik Identitas Kiai (Studi Kasus di desa Kalanganyar Sedati Sidoarjo, JAS: Jurnal ilmiah Akhwal Syakhsiyyah UNISMA Vol 1 Nomer 2 tahun 2019.

DPR RI, http://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_2009_48.pdf, diakses 23 Nopember 2019.

Farida, Ida, Studi Dokumen dalam penelitian Kualitatif, Jurnal Sains dan Inovasi Vol. 6 No. 1 tahun 2010.

Hasanah, Hasyim, Teknik-teknik Observasi (sebuah metode alternative pengumpulan data Kualitatif ilmu-ilmu social), Jurnal At-Taqaddum Vol. 8 No. 1 Juli 2016.

Lianawati, Ester ,Tiada Keadilan tanpa kepedulian KDRT Perspektif Psikologi Feminis (Cet. 1). Yogyakarta: Paradigma Indonesia (Group Elmatera), 2009.

Mertokusumo,Sudikno,dalam M. NurRasid, 2003, Hukum Acara PerdataCet III, Jakarta:,SinarGrafika. 1985.

Rahmat, Pupu Saeful, Penelitian Kualitatif, Jurnal Equilibrium Vol. 5 No. 9 Januari-juni 2009.

Unika Prihatsanti Dkk, Menggunakan studi kasus sebagai metode ilmiah dalam Psikologi, Buleti Psikologi (Jurnal UGM) Vol. 26 No. 2 tahun 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14