Editorial Policies

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The editorial team will read every submitted manuscript. Manuscripts that are evaluated by editors and not suitable with criteria of journal will be rejected without external review. Then, a manuscript that has a special interest to readers is send to peer reviewers, with two (2) different reviewers for each article by using the double blind system
All submissions can be done through an open journal system (OJS) or send via email to the Editorial Team. The editor will check all submitted articles. If they do not meet the journal criteria, they will be rejected without review. Articles that comply with journal criteria will be checked for plagiarism and send to the peer reviewer process. If the articles need for revision, they will be returned to the authors. The editor makes the decision based on the reviewer's recommendation as follows:

  • Article can be accepted without change
  • Article can be accepted with minor revisions
  • Article can be accepted with major revisions through reviewer’s recommendation
  • Article is rejected.

The steps of submission process can be seen below.

 

Open Access Policy

JISoP provides open access which aims at supporting the exchange of greater knowledge. All articles are bound with the Creative Commons Attributions-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (JISoP) is a peer reviewed journal published biannually by Research Institutions and community service Universitas Islam Malang. The JISoP follows the guidelines set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)in all aspects of publication ethics. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the Author, Editorial Board, and the reviewers.


Duties of Authors

  • Reporting Standars: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  • Data Access and Retention: Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  • Originality and Plagiaris: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  • Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

 

Duties of Editors

  • Fair Play: An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
  • Publication Decisions: The editor board journal are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  • Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

 

Duties of Reviewers

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  • Promptness: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
  • Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Reviewer Guidelines

The reviewers are responsible for evaluating the submitted articles in the area of expertise, and then giving constructive suggestion to the authors. Reviewers must consider the following notes:

  1. Do the reviewed articles fit their expertise? If they do not fit the area of expertise, reviewere are allowed to confirm the editorial team.
  2. Do reviewers have time to review articles? The review process must be completed within 2 weeks or they are able to request for the extension of time.
  3. Reviewers can contact the editors for any conflict of interest with the articles.
  4. Reviewers can contact the editors for any indication of plagiarism.


REVIEW PROCESS

  1. The relevance between the topic of articles and the scope of journal.
  2. The contribution of articles regarding the authenticity, renewal and uniqueness.
  3. The organization of the articles with regard to language used, clarity of content, and easy to understand.

 


PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES

TITLE
Is the title appropriate, concise, and clearly describes the content of articles?

ABSTRACT

  1. Does it attract the attention and encourage the reader to read the full article?
  2. Does the brief, clear and complete abstract explain the contents of the entire article?
  3. Abstract must be written in Indonesian and English.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Does it describe the problem, scope, and purpose clearly?
  2. Does it describe the novelty / contribution of your paper?


LITERATURE REVIEW
Does it consist of the relevant approaches, theories, or concepts as a basis for analysis?

METHOD

  1. Does it describe the procedures of research clearly?
  2. Does it describe the method used to solve the problem?


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

  1. Has the presentation of results and analysis been completed by tables and figures?
  2. Is there correlation between the results and the concept of theory?
  3. Do results and discussion describe its implementation, both of theory and practice?


CONCLUSION

  1. Does it contain the recommendation and summary of research?
  2. Do the recommendations correlate with the study being conducted?
  3. Does the summary reflect the answer of research problem?


REFERENCES

  1. Are the references cited in the articles using the American Psychological Association (APA) style?
  2. Are the references published in the last 10 years?


THE PRESENTATION OF REVIEW RESULTS
After the reviewers are willing to do a review, they can download the articles and supplementary files, fill out a review form, and upload it for editors and authors. Then, they are expected to provide recommendations regarding the quality of articles with the following options:

  • Manuscript can be accepted without changes
  • Manuscript can be accepted with minor revisions
  • Manuscript can be accepted with major revisions with the necessary changes as recommendations
  • Manuscript is rejected

The review must be completed within 2 weeks. If the extension of time is needed, please inform the editorial team or contact on jisop@unisma.ac.id

 

Screening For Plagiarism

Plagiarism screening uses Turnitin with a maximum word similarity score of 20%.

The process of plagiarism screening in JISoP are described as follows:

  1. The submitted articles will be screened for plagiarism before the initial review process.
  2. The articles that have passed the plagiarism screening will be processed to the initial review and peer review.
  3. If the articles are declared ACCEPTED before publication, plagiarism screening will be carried out double.

 

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (USD)
Authors are required to pay Article Submission Fees as part of the submission process to contribute the review fees.

Article Publication: 44.00 (USD) or 650.000 (IDR)
If the article is declared acceptable for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover the costs of publication.

If you do not have the funds to pay these fees, you will have the opportunity to waive any costs. JISoP will not prevent the publication of a decent work.



سایت شرط بندی بازی انفجار با ضرایب بالا بهترین سایت پیش بینی فوتبال آموزش شرط بندی فوتبال سایت شرط بندی حضرات ریچ بت گاد بت سایت نیلی افشار سایت هات بت دنیا جهانبخت در شهروند بت آدرس سایت لایو بت در شهروند بت آدرس سایت تاینی بت در شهروند بت آدرس سایت یلماست بت در شهروند بت سایت ای بی تی 90 در شهروند بت پابلو بت در شهروند بت سایت هیس بت مهراد جمح ولف بت میلاد حاتمی در شهروند بت بازی انفجار چیست در شهروند بت آموزش بازی انفجار آدرس سایت شرط بندی حضرات بت پویان مختاری سایت شرط بندی هات بت دنیا جهانبخت سایت بازی انفجار تاینی بت هیس بت سایت شرط بندی سایت شرط بندی یلماس بت ندا یاسی سایت شرط بندی سیب بت سایت جت بت سایت abt90 ساشا سبحانی سایت شرط بندی لایو بت آموزش بازی انفجار آموزش هک بازی انفجار الگوریتم بازی انفجار بهترین سایت بازی انفجار آنلاین دانلود اپلیکیشن بازی انفجار شرط بندی ترفندهای برد بازی انفجار روبات تشخیص ضریب بازی انفجار آموزش برنده شدن در بازی انفجار آدرس سایت بت هیس بت سایت مهراد جم جت بت سایت میلاد حاتمی آدرس سایت تاینی بت آدرس سایت لایو بت داوود هزینه آدرس سایت حضرات پویان مختاری آموزش حرفه ای بازی انفجار آموزش بازی حکم در پرشین بت آموزش پیش بینی فوتبال در پرشین بت بهترین سایت های شرط بندی ایرانی آموزش بازی انفجار تاینی هلپ آموزش بازی انفجار سایت هیوا نیوز اخبار سلبریتی ها تاینی نیوز google bahis online bahis siteleri casino FaceBook twitter آدرس جدید سایت بت فوروارد فارسی آدرس جدید سایت سیب بت بیوگرافی دنیا جهانبخت آموزش بازی انفجار آنلاین برای بردن سایت شرط بندی حضرات پویان مختاری سایت ای بی تی 90 ساشا سبحانی سایت پیش بینی فوتبال پرشین بت آموزش قوانین بازی پوکر آنلاین شرطی خیانت پویان مختاری به نیلی افشار سایت لایو بت داوود هزینه سایت پابلو بت علیشمس سایت تاک تیک بت سایت شرط بندی حضرات بت اپلیکیشن بت فوروارد دنیا جهانبخت کیست سایت شرط بندی هات بت دنیا جهانبخت سایت گاد بت نیلی افشار سایت شرط بندی فوتبال معتبر سایت شرط بندی فوتبال معتبر Pablobet