Interaksionisme Simbolik Aparatus Dan Pekerja Seks Di Bali

Authors

  • I Dewa Ayu S Joni Universitas Udayana
  • Ni Nyoman Dewi Pascarani Universitas Udayana
  • Tedi Erviantono Universitas Udayana & Mahasiswa S3 Ilmu Politik UGM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4807

Keywords:

symbolic interactionism, sex workers, state apparatus

Abstract

This article explores a form of symbolic interaction between the formal security apparatus of the State and sex workers in Bali. The study uses qualitative research methods with data collection methods for interviews and observations. Through this type of research traced the efforts of sex workers to communicate in order to negotiate their interests with the power represented by the local government security apparatus (apparatus). Sanders' (2001) and O'Neill's (2001) study shows sex workers are resistant to control. But in this capacity, sex workers have a communication style to negotiate activities with local state officials. Theory used symbolic interactionism from Blumer. In the field data obtained there are two types of meaning in symbolic interactions. Sex worker as a party spreading disease and violation of morality. Even this is used as building the meaning of the moral image of regional leaders. In this symbolic interaction meaning, sex workers with bureaucratic state apparatus are very dependent on social structures in society which depend on social status, involvement in sex trade organizations, and laws or policies related to the regulation of CSWs. Bali as a world tourism destination prioritizes the basic value of the development of cultural tourism and has never once declared it as sex tourism. It's just ironic that Bali is often used as a transit point for the existence of the trafficking industry before they depart overseas. Bali is used as the main transit of commercial sex workers in the women's trafficking network. Although in the interactionism the symbolic meaning of the repression of the state apparatus is still considered to manifest a patriarchal value system that provides more legal sanctions to service providers in this case sex workers, especially women, than their users, namely men.

References

Buku

Althusser, Louis. 2015. Ideologi dan Aparatus Ideologi Negara. Indo Progress : Jakarta

Hubbard, Phil, Matthews, Roger, dan Scoular, Jane. 2008. Regulating sex work in the EU: prostitute women and the new spaces of exclusion, dalam Gender, Place and Culture Vol. 15, No. 2, April 2008, 137–152, Routledge.

Hernes, Helga Maria. 1987b. The Welfare State and Women Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo : Norwegian University Press. Lebih lanjut lihat Mattson, ibid.

Joni, Dewa Ayu Sugiarica. 2018. Pemanfaatan Media Online Pekerja Seks Pria di Bali. Laporan Penelitian.

Mattson, Greggor, Christian. 2008. Governing Loose Women: Rationalizing European prostitution, 1998–2004. University of California, Berkeley, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2008. 3331707

Mattson, Greggor. The Cultural Politics of European Prostitution Reform: Governing Loose Women. Palgrave Macmillan : UK.

Moleong. Lexi.J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

O’Neill, Maggie & Pitcher, Jane. 2001. Prostitution: Sex Work, Policy & Politics. Sage : London.

Jurnal

Banurea, Rima Nusantriani. Berlindung dalam Hak Asasi Manusia : Strategi Pekerja Seks di Eropa untuk Mentransformasi Kebijakan Prostitusi, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Volume 16, Nomor 3, Maret 2013. Halaman 274.

Caswanto, NPM. ‎2016. Tindak Pidana Prostitusi yang Diusahakan dan Disediakan oleh Hotel di Indramayu dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. repository.unpas.ac.id/4975/3/BAB%20I.pdf

Duarte, Magdalena. 2012. Prostitution and Trafficking in Portugal: Legislation, Policy, and Claims. Sex Res Soc Policy (2012) 9:258–268 DOI 10.1007/s13178-012-0093-2

Harringtonn, Carol. 2011. Governing Sex Workers in Timor Leste. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 04/2011, Volume 52, Issue 1

Mariyadi. 2013. Persepsi Masyarakat tentang Prostitusi Liar di Keluarahan Sempaja Utara Samarinda. Journal Volume II. No. 4. Tahun 2013.

Sanders, Teela. 2001. Blinded by morality? Prostitution policy in the UK. Capital & Class, Issue 86; serta Sanders, Teela & Brown, Kate. 2017. Pragmatic, Progressive, Problematic: Addressing Vulnerability through a Local Street Sex Work Partnership Initiative. Social Policy & Society (2017)16:3, 429–441 C.

Sauer, Birgit. 2004. Taxes, rights and regimentation: discourses on prostitution in Austria. Dalam The Politics of Prostitution : Women’s Movements, Democratic States and The Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Dalam Outshoorn. Op.cit. Halaman 41

Saputra, RP. Dampak Praktek Prostitusi terhadap Pengembangan Pariwisata di Sekitar Parangtritis. eprints.uny.ac.id/53389/5/Ringkasan%2013413241037.pdf

Umiarso, Elbadiansah. 2016. Interaksionisme Simbolik: Dari Era Klasik hingga Modern. Rajagrafindo Press : Jakarta

Weitzer. Ronald. 2009. Morality Politics in Western Australia. The British Journal of Criminology,Vol. 49, No. 1, Moral Panics—36 Years On Januari 2009, pp. 88-105.

Surat Kabar

Bali Ekspress, 5 Januari 2018

cnnIndonesia, 25 Mei 2018

Sindonews, 26 Agustus 2018

Downloads

Published

2019-10-19

How to Cite

Ayu S Joni, I. D., Dewi Pascarani, N. N., & Erviantono, T. (2019). Interaksionisme Simbolik Aparatus Dan Pekerja Seks Di Bali. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 1(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4807