PEER REVIEW PROCESS

OVERVIEW

All submissions can be made using our online journal systems or emailed directly to the editorial office. The editorial office will determine whether or not a manuscript is suitable for publication and meet the journal aims and scope before being processed further to the reviewing processes. Thus, those manuscripts submitted that meet our expectation/requirement will be process processed through peer reviews. The editor in chief will contact the author(s) once the results are available. The editor in chief has full authority to make one of the following decisions upon received reviewers and editorial board’s comments

  • Publish as is
  • Conditionally accept with minor revisions (editor will check)
  • Conditionally accept with necessary changes as recommended by reviewer
  • The article should be thoroughly changed
  • Reject

In simple way, the figures below may help you to understand the JEMA Editorial, Review, and Publishing Process.

Every article that goes to the editorial staff are read by the editorial staff. Those manuscripts evaluated by editors to be inappropriate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to the peer reviewer. Reviewer are unaware of the identity of the authors and the authors didnt know the identity of reviewers. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer recommendation.

Before Article is accepted, article will check witn Plagiarism Checker X software.


DUTIES OF AUTHORS >> CLICK


BECOME ONE OF JEMA REVIEWER

We are inviting you to become one of our journal reviewer. We will be appreciated if you could fill up the embeded form below ;