Analisis Kesalahan dan Persepsi Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika SMA dalam Ujian Berbasis Komputer

Authors

  • Ahmat Wakit Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara
  • Erna Zumrotun Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara
  • Wulan Sutriyani Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v8i1.15399

Keywords:

Persepsi Siswa, Kesalahan Siswa, Ujian Berbasis Komputer

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The purpose of this study was to determine students' perceptions in carrying out computer-based tests (CBT) and to describe students' mistakes in solving math problems in CBT. Data collection methods used are questionnaires, interviews and documentation. The research subjects were 1 class majoring in religion and 1 class majoring in science. The results of this study indicate that the average score on the computer-based test (CBT) in religion class is 51.16, the score on algebra questions is 56.96, the score on calculus questions is 54.59, the score on geometry and trigonometry questions is 36.61 and the score on statistics questions. and the odds are 42.06. The average score on the computer-based test (CBT) in the Science class is 35.71, the score on algebra questions is 36.97, the score on calculus questions is 25.71, the score on geometry and trigonometry questions is 23.21 and the score on statistics and probability questions is 42.86. Students' perceptions of computer-based exams are classified as very good. The advantage of CBT is that computer-based exams are more effective, there are warnings if there are unanswered questions, for English questions using a headset so that listening questions are clearer and you don't have to worry about the exam paper being damaged. Meanwhile, the weakness of CBT is that it can hurt the eyes because the light from the computer screen is too bright when carrying out a computer-based exam.


Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif desktiptif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa dalam melaksanakan ujian berbasis komputer/computer based test (CBT) dan untuk mendeskripsikan kesalahan siswa menyelesaikan soal matematika SMA dalam CBT. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan angket, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Subjek penelitian adalah 1 kelas jurusan keagaman dan 1 kelas jurusan IPA. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata ujian berbasis komputer kelas jurusan Keagamaan adalah 51.16, nilai pada soal aljabar 56.96, nilai pada soal kalkulus 54.59, nilai pada soal geometri dan trigonometri 36.61 dan nilai pada soal statistika dan peluang adalah 42.06. Nilai rata-rata ujian berbasis komputer di kelas Jurusan IPA adalah 35.71, nilai pada soal aljabar 36.97, nilai pada soal kalkulus 25.71, nilai pada soal geometri dan trigonometri 23.21 dan nilai pada soal statistika dan peluang adalah 42.86. Persepsi siswa terhadap ujian berbasis komputer tergolong sangat baik. Keunggulan CBT adalah pelaksanaan ujian berbasis komputer lebih efektif, ada peringatan jika ada soal yang belum terjawab, untuk soal Bahasa inggris menggunakan headset sehingga soal listening lebih jelas dan tidak khawatir kertas ujian rusak. Sedangkan kelemahan CBT adalah dapat membuat mata pedih karena cahaya dari layar komputer terlalu terang saat melaksanakan ujian berbasis komputer.

References

Alex, Marzuki, A. G., Farkhan, M., Surahman, D., Daryanto, D., & Febrianto, S. (2020). Computer Based Testing in Senior High School on National Examination. Indonesia Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 2(2), 204–210. Retrieved from doi.org/10.31960/ ijolec.v2i2.340

Biantoro, B., & Arfianti, A. D. (2019). Issues in the Implementation of Computer-based National Exam ( CBNE ) in Indonesian Secondary Schools. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 353(IcoSIHESS), 399–403.

Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R., Albers, C. J., Beetsma, Y., & Bosker, R. J. (2015). Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High- Stakes Exams in Higher Education : Results of a Field Experiment. PLoS ONE, 10 (12), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616

Dewi, A. R., Saehu, A., & Budiman, R. (2021). Students’ Perception of Computer-Based Testing Edubox- and its Impact on Their English Learning Motivation. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 19–28. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v4i1.4341

Fitriyah, S., & Laily, N. (2018). The Analysis of Computer Based Test (CBT) Implementation: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 2 (2)(March), 310–319.

Handoko, Tolla, B., & Suprihati, Y. (2019). The Evaluation of Computer-Based National Examination System in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Review, 6(1), 35–43.

Jaelani, A., Kristiawan, M., & Rohana. (2020). Computer Based National Examination Policy , Implementation and Problem. ITS, 3, 13–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31058/j.edu.2020.32002

Jamaludin, Darnawati, & Uke, W. A. S. (2018). Students ’ Perception Towards National Examination 2017 : Computer-Based Test or Paper-Based Test. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4), 139–143. http://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2018-0083

Khoshsima, H., & Toroujeni, S. M. H. (2017). Computer-Based Testing: Score Equivalence and Testing Administration Mode Preference in a Comparative Evaluation Study. iJET, 12(10), 35–55.

Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, R. A., Kusumawati, N. S., & Ambarwati, O. C. (2018). Students Perception on the Use of Computer Based Test. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012103

Nurhikmah, H., Gani, H. A., Pratama, M. P., & Wijaya, H. (2021). Development of an Android-based Computer Based Test ( CBT ) In Middle School. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 272–281.

Öz, H., & Özturan, T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode influence the reliability and validity of achievement tests? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67–85.

Pomalato, S. W. D., Ili, L., Ningsi, B. A., Fadhilaturrahmi, Hasibuan, A. T., & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Student Error Analysis in Solving Mathematical Problems. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5183–5187. http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081118

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuatitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulastri, S., & Puspawati, I. (2019). A Computer-Based Standardized Testing : The Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Learning, 4(1), 14–27. http://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.4135

Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S. S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. (2010). Computer-based Testing : Practices and Considerations Computer-based Testing : Practices and Considerations. (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Wise, S. L. (2019). Controlling construct-irrelevant factors through computer-based testing : disengagement , anxiety , & cheating. Education Inquiry, 10(1), 21–33. http://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1490127.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-02-14

How to Cite

Wakit, A., Zumrotun, E., & Sutriyani, W. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan dan Persepsi Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika SMA dalam Ujian Berbasis Komputer. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v8i1.15399