Pembangkangan Hukum: Menakar Kepatuhan Organisasi Advokat Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap

Authors

  • Susanto Faculty of Law Pamulang University
  • Nurhayati Faculty of Law Pamulang University
  • Dadan Herdiana Faculty of Law Pamulang University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i1.15406

Keywords:

Legal Disobedience, Brand, Advocate

Abstract

The split within the Indonesian Advocates Association led to a dispute with its splinter organization, the Indonesian Advocates Association. The two have similarities in the use of the PERADIN brand, which has led to lawsuits in court. This research was conducted to determine the compliance of the Advocate Organization under the name Indonesian Advocates Association with a court decision that has permanent legal force related to the PERADIN organization brand dispute. The method used is qualitative normative research with a statutory approach in relation to the problems in this research. The results showed that the Indonesian Advocates Association illegally used the PERADIN Mark belonging to the Indonesian Advocates Association and the decision had permanent legal force. Even though there has been a decision with permanent legal force, the Indonesian Advocates Association did not voluntarily carry out the contents of the decision and even filed 5 (five) other lawsuits.

References

A. Abdul Fatah, (2018), Peran Advokat dalam Penangan Kasus Litigasi, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, Volume 13, Nomor 1.

Fajar Laksono Soeroso, (2013), “Pembangkangan” Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume 6, Nomor 3.

Haris Munandar & Sally Sitanggang, (2008), Mengenai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Hak Cipta, Paten, Merek dan Seluk-beluknya, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Haswandy Andy Mas, (22 Desember 2021), Sejarah Konflik Organisasi Advokat di Indonesia, Diakses pada 27 Januari 2023, Dari Bahasan.id: https://bahasan.id/sejarah-konflik-organisasi-advokat-di-indonesia/.

Hibnu Nugroho, (2019), Peran Advokat dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan yang Berintegritas, Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 7, Nomor 1.

Irfan Rusyadi, (2018), Analisis Terhadap Penghapusan Proses Peradilan Dalam Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Studi Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan), Skripsi, UII.

Kontributor, (9 Septermber 2019), 28 Organisasi Advokat di Indonesia, Diakses pada 27 Januari 2023, Dari Suara Kalimantan: https://www.suarakalimantan.com/2019/09/09/28-organisasi-advokat-di-indonesia/.

Novendri Nggilu, (2019), Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 1.

Rachmadi Usman, (2003), Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Bandung: Alumni.

Rendy H. Permana, (2016), Analisis terhadap status pendaftaran Merek Logo Peradin yang telah dilindungi oleh hak cipta ditinjau dari undang-undang nomor 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek. Skripsi, Universitas Tarumanegara.

Ronny H. Soemitro, (1998), Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Semarang: Ghalia Indonesia.

Soerjono Soekanto, (2001), Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Suhrawardi K. Lubis, (1994), Etika Profesi Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Published

30.01.2023

How to Cite

Susanto, Nurhayati, and Dadan Herdiana. 2023. “Pembangkangan Hukum: Menakar Kepatuhan Organisasi Advokat Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap”. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 6 (1):67-82. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i1.15406.