ISLAMIC EDUCATION LEADERSHIP IN BUILDING TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BALUN VILLAGE, TURI SUB-DISTRICT, LAMONGAN DISTRICT

Authors

  • Solchan Ghozali Universitas Sunan Giri ( UNSURI )

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jemois.v1i2.10982

Keywords:

Leadership, Islamic Education, Religious Life Tolerance

Abstract

The research objective is to describe, analyze, and interpret the type of Islamic education leadership in building religious tolerance, the role of Islamic education in building tolerance in religious life, Islamic education leadership models in building tolerance of religious life. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of phenomenology. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews, participant observation and documentation study. Determination of informants was carried out using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The data analysis technique uses the interactive model analysis technique of Miles and Huberman. While the data validity test technique used triangulation technique. The results of the study answered the focus that the type of Islamic education leadership in building religious tolerance is collaborative-paternalistic-democratic. The paternalistic type referred to is the type of leadership that is fatherly, protective, and educational. Meanwhile, the democratic type is meant to treat everyone equally and to provide opportunities for diverse and diverse communities to actively participate in realizing a harmonious and peaceful religious life. This type of leadership is characterized by the following characters of religious leaders: a) Promoting tolerance and togetherness; b)  Protecting; c) Prioritizing human dignity. The role of the leadership of Islamic education in building tolerance in religious life is as: a) religious experts; b) role models in behavior; c) As well as Mediators. Religious leaders carry out a leadership mechanism in maintaining the socio-cultural system that has survived for decades. Some changes are evolutive. However, for decades, the values of togetherness, harmony and tolerance have been substantively maintained by society. This is inseparable from the leadership role of religious leaders who are united in being committed to maintaining harmony and peace between religious communities. The leadership model of Islamic education is transformational-internal-collective. The transformational leadership model is characterized by several patterns of behavior as follows: a) Implanting trust; b) Civilizing art; c) Maintaining tradition; d) Educating and guiding; and e) Maintaining effective communication. Religious leaders carry out their leadership duties collectively. This means that religious leaders collaborate collegial on it collectively to become joint leaders between religious communities who carry out a common vision of realizing harmonious and harmonious daily lives of citizens. Religious leaders provide charisma, inspiration, intellectual stimulation, and individual consideration that are oriented towards inter-religious harmony by harmonizing religious values while applying the principles of leadership Rasulullah’s style, so that they can manifest themselves as caliphs on earth, who are always committed to carrying out benefit.

References

Ahmadi, Rulam, (2014). Qualitative Research Methodology, Yogyakarta, Ar-Ruzz Media.

Banks, James A., (2007). Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society, New York; teacher College.

Creswell, Jhon W., (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Tradition London: SAGE Publications.

Mu'awanah, (2009). Management of Student Islamic Boarding Schools, Yogjakarta: STAIN Kediri.

Fadhil al Jamaly, Muhammad, (1993). Philosophy of Education in the Qur'an, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Faisal, Sanapiah, (1990). Qualitative Research: Basics and Applications, Malang: YA3.

Irmawan Jauhari, Moh., (2016). Challenges of Islamic Boarding Schools in the era of Globalization, Dar el Ilmi, vol 2 no 2 October 2016.

___________________, (2017). Pesantren resistance during the Dutch colonial era, Kuttab, vol. 1, number 2 September 2017.

Komariah, Aan, (2006). Visionary Leadership Towards Effective Schools, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kuswarno, Engkus, (2008). Ethnography of Communication; An Introduction and Research Example, Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

Lukman, Ali, (1994). Indonesia Dictionary. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Motahhari, Murtadha, (1995). Divine Justice: Principles of Islamic World View, Bandung: Mizan.

Mahfud, Choirul, (2014). Multicultural Education, Yogjakarta: Student Library.

Nasution, S., (2003). Qualitative Naturalistic Research Methods. Bandung: TARSITO.

Noer Aly, Hery, (1999). Islamic Education, Jakarta: logos.

Siregar, Nina Siti Salmaniah, (2011). "The Study of Symbolic Interactionism", Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Uma Issn: 2085 - 0328, Perspectives / Volume 4 / Number 2 / October.

Spradley, James P., (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Tilaar, HAR, (1998). Several Agenda for National Education Reform in the Perspective of the 21st Century, Magelang: Tera Indonesia.

Team of the Director-General of Education, Religious and Religious Education Statistics for the 2007 academic year, Jakarta: Director General of Islamic Education, Ministry of Religion.

Tholchah Hasan, Muhammad (2007). Islam in a Socio-Cultural Perspective, Jakarta: Lantabora Press.

Wiriaatmaja, Rochiati, (2007). Classroom Action Research Methods, Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Winkel, WS., (2009). Teaching Psychology, Jogjakarta: Media Abadi.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-01