Transformation of vape in social space: From medical technology to mode (A study on social construction of technology perspective)

Authors

  • Febriansyah Febriansyah Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v4i1.15717

Keywords:

Vape, E-cigarette, SCOT, Social Construction

Abstract

Vape or e-cigarettes emerged as a medical technology to help heavy smokers quit smoking or get rid of their addiction to tobacco cigarettes since tobacco cigarettes contain harmful substances that can cause many deadly diseases. In its development, vaping has transformed into a popular product which considered as a fashion or part of the lifestyle of young people. How did it happen? This conceptual article will answer this problem by using the desk study method and the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) theory. This article finds that the relevant society or social group strongly influences the transformation or evolution of vaping. Vaping is interpreted as a fashion by the relevant community or social group. This interpretation continues to be negotiated in the social sphere so that some groups define vaping as a smoking technology in the future when tobacco cigarettes will be replaced by it. The author also sees the influence of consumerism culture under neoliberalism, which is the context in the construction of vapes.

References

Arifuddin, M. R., & Irwansyah. (2019). Dari foto dan video ke toko: Perkembangan instagram dalam perspektif konstruksi sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Kajian Media, 3(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.31002/jkkm.v3i1.1256

Ayers, J. W., Leas, E. C., Allem, J.-P., Benton, A., Dredze, M., Althouse, B. M., Cruz, T. B., & Unger, J. B. (2017). Why do people use electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)? A content analysis of Twitter, 2012-2015. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0170702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170702

Brueck, H. (2019). The wild history of vaping, from a 1927 “electric vaporizer†to today’s mysterious lung injury crisis. Insider.Com. https://www.insider.com/history-of-vaping-who-invented-e-cigs-2019-10

Dwianto, A. R. (2019). Jalan Panjang Vape, Lahir di 1930-an Hingga Kini Jadi Kontroversi. DetikHealth. https://health.detik.com/berita-detikhealth/d-4801168/jalan-panjang-vape-lahir-di-1930-an-hingga-kini-jadi-kontroversi

Electronic Cigarette Association. (2009). The Facts About Electronic Cigarettes. Electronic Cigarette Association (ECA). www.ecassoc.org

Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors ’ Comment : So , What Is a Conceptual Paper ? SAGE Journals, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425

Gotts, J. E., Jordt, S., Mcconnell, R., & Tarran, R. (2019). What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes ? BMJ, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5275

Hague, P., Harrison, M., Cupman, J., & Truman, O. (2016). Market Research in Practice: An Introduction to Gaining Greater Market Insight (3rd ed.). Kogan Page Limited.

Hirschheim, R. (2008). Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(8), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00167

Hutapea, D. S. M., & Fasya, T. K. (2021). Rokok Elektrik (Vape) Sebagai Gaya Hidup Perokok Masa Kini Di Kota Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM), 2(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v2i1.3696

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13162-020-00161-0/TABLES/2

Jarmul, S., Aherrera, A., Rule, A. M., Olmedo, P., Chen, R., & Navas-acien, A. (2017). Lost in E-Cigarette Clouds : A Culture on the Rise. Am J Public Health, 107(2), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303463

Jerzyński, T., Stimson, G. V., Shapiro, H., & Król, G. (2021). Estimation of the global number of e-cigarette users in 2020. Harm Reduction Journal, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00556-7

Kim, H., Davis, A. H., Dohack, J. L., & Clark, P. I. (2017). E-Cigarettes Use Behavior and Experience of Adults: Qualitative Research Findings to Inform E-Cigarette Use Measure Development. Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 19(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw175

Lawson, C. (2008). An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne200812114

Lyu, J. C., Luli, G. K., & Ling, P. M. (2021). Vaping discussion in the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study using Twitter data. PLoS ONE, 16(12 December), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260290

McCausland, K., Jancey, J., Leaver, T., Wolf, K., Freeman, B., & Maycock, B. (2020). Motivations for use, identity and the vaper subculture: a qualitative study of the experiences of Western Australian vapers. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09651-z

McLuhan, M. (2013). The Medium is the Message. In Understanding Media The extensions of man (1st ed., pp. 7–23). Ginko Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.019367

Mixdam, C. B. S., Slamet, Y., & Supriyadi. (2020). Social Construction and The Meaning of The Use of Electric Cigarettes in Female Electric Cigarette Users. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 3(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2020.3028

Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (J. Lasser (ed.); 2nd ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Paramita, F. B. A. C. (2021). Changes in culture and matchmaking behavior: online dating on Tinder. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijss.v13i1.26353

Peia, M. (2010). Integrating the Old with the New : Understanding the Social Construction of Cell Phone Technology. 2009-2010 Penn Humanities Forum on Connections, 1–58. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=uhf_2010

Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004

Putra, D. A. (2021). Jumlah Pengguna 2,2 Juta Orang, Potensi Ekonomi Rokok Elektrik Kian Menjanjikan? Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4463075/jumlah-pengguna-22-juta-orang-potensi-ekonomi-rokok-elektrik-kian-menjanjikan

Santana, I., Zuryani, N., & Kamajaya, G. (2018). Konstruksi Sosial Rokok Elektrik (Vape) Sebagai Substitusi Rokok Tembakau bagi Perokok Aktif di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Lmiah Sosiologi: SOROT, 1(1). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/sorot/article/view/37702

Sari, D. K. (2015). Penggunaan Media Sosial di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Social Construction of Technology. In I. P. Hadi (Ed.), Information and Communication Technology, dan Literasi Media Digital (pp. 3–22). ASPIKOM.

Steinert, S. (2016). Taking Stock of Extension Theory of Technology. Philosophy & Technology, 29(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13347-014-0186-3

U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services. (2016). E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/e-cigarettes/index.htm#:~:text=E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults%3A A Report,the Surgeon General on tobacco.

VanderStoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D. (2009). Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1st ed.).

Yousefikhah, S. (2017). Sociology of innovation: Social construction of technology perspective. AD-Minister, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.17230/AD-MINISTER.30.2

Zhu, S. H., Sun, J. Y., Bonnevie, E., Cummins, S. E., Gamst, A., Yin, L., & Lee, M. (2014). Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: Implications for product regulation. Tobacco Control, 23(suppl 3), iii3–iii9. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670

Published

2022-05-16

How to Cite

Febriansyah, F. (2022). Transformation of vape in social space: From medical technology to mode (A study on social construction of technology perspective). Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 4(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v4i1.15717