Rezim Baru Monarki Thailand: Antara Darurat Militer Dan Kesejahteraan Sosial Di Wilayah Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4799Keywords:
regime, monarchy, military, social welfareAbstract
Muslim communities in Southern Thailand have experienced in discrimination among in economic, social, and politics. This condition has even occurred in the last seven decades under King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who was known  to be wise king. Basically, King Bhumibol as the head of state always stated that social welfare approace is the best way to solve the problem, but almost every Thai Prime Minister as the head of government unfortunately always uses a militaristic approach that triggers social resistance. Since King Bhumibol died, Thailand has faced with the potential crisis for two reasons. First, Maha Vajiralongkorn as a successor, he is considered have different charisma with his father because he is very glamorous and have controversial lifestyle. Secondly, the absence of King Bhumibol, who has been a counterweight to the state made the Thai military more often coups. This conditions give impact to Muslim communities in the South who always live with uncertainty condition with two possibilities. First, Muslim communities have a better life under the new monarchy regime with social welfare and humanity approaches. Secondly, the condition of the Muslim communities will remains stagnant under the controversial king with continued by martial law.References
Aphornsuvan, T. (2003). History and Politics of the Muslim in Thailand. Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Farrelly, N. (2017). Thailand’s Triple Threat. Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Handley, P. M. (2006). The King Never Smiles: A Biography of Thailand's Bhumibol Adulyadej. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Jackson, P. A. (2017). Grateful Son, A Military King: Thai Media Accounts of the Accession of Rama X to the Throne. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Kusuma, B. M. A. (2017). “Islam, Asymmetric Policy, and Social Conflict: The State's Role as a Root of Radicalism in the Philippines and Thailandâ€. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 1 No. 1, 33-46.
__________ (2016). “Masyarakat Muslim Thailand dan Dampak Psikologis Kebijakan Asimilasi Budayaâ€. Hisbah: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam Vol. 13 No. 1, 109-120.
__________ dan Octastefani, T. (2016). “Patani United Liberation Organization: From Jihad to Local Politics Movementâ€. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration Vol. 2 No. 1, 33-44.
McCargo, D. (2017). Southern Thailand: From Conflict to Negotiations? Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
__________ (2012). “The Changing Politics of Thailand’s Buddhist Orderâ€. Critical Asian Studies Vol. 44 No. 4, 627-642.
Nurakkate, C. (2012), “The Conflict in Southern Thailandâ€. Shedden Papers, March Edition, 1-18.
Pongsudhirak, T. (2017). “Thailand After King Bhumibol: Foreign and Security Policy Implicationsâ€. Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector of National Institute for Defense Studies Research Series, 15, 57-68.
Pradityo, S. (2017). Intermeso: Takhta untuk Pangeran Bengal. Diakses melalui link https://x.detik.com/detail/intermeso/20161014/Takhta-untuk-Pangeran-Bengal/index.php pada 2 Agustus 2018.
Rozaki, A., Kusuma, B. M. A, dan Faiz, A. A. (2019). “Political Economy of the Muslim Middle Class in Southeast Asia: Religious Expression Trajectories in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailandâ€. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 3 No. 1, 95-118.
Yusuf, I. (2009). “Ethnoreligious and Political Dimensions of the Southern Thailand Conflictâ€. Pandya, A. & Laipson, E. (ed). Islam and Politics: Renewal and Resistance in the Muslim World. Washington: The Henry Stimson Center.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
.