Renewal of Intellectual Property Execution Auction Regulations to Support Creative Economy Actors Financing Schemes

Authors

  • Fildzah Rio Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Lastuti Abubakar Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Dewi Kania Sugiharti Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v8i2.21588

Keywords:

Financing, Creative Economy Actors, Intelectual Property, Execution Auction

Abstract

Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy aims to optimize intellectual property as credit or financing collateral for creative economy actors. From the banking side, intellectual property as an object of collateral cannot be implemented for various reasons, including those related to the execution of intellectual property in the event of bad credit or financing. Eventhough auction regulations recognize intellectual property as intangible assets that can be executed, they still don’t provide legal certainty for both creditors and debtors. This research aims to analyse regulatory constraints in intellectual property execution auctions and renewal in auction regulations that need to be carried out to support creative economy financing schemes. This research uses a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive research specifications and qualitative juridical data analysis. Based on the research, the following results were obtained: Although intellectual property is recognized as an object of execution auctions, regulation haven’t provide certainty regarding the execution mechanism, especially regarding the transfer of intellectual property rights. So, the idea is to make the rules stricter so that execution auctions can support intellectual property-based financing schemes for people working in the creative economy.

References

Ade Rafli, Muhammad, Erlina Bachri, and Suta Ramadan. “Implementasi Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif (studi pada Dirjen Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Provinsi Lampung dan Bank Indonesia: Kekayaan Intelektual dan Ekonomi Kreatif.” Journal Presumption of Law 5, no. 1 (April 28, 2023): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.31949/jpl.v5i1.4497.

Angela, Irene Maria, and Switcha Differentia Ariapramuda. “Problematik Pelaksanaan Hak Cipta Atas Permainan Video Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Padjadjaran Law Review 9, no. 1 (August 19, 2021). https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/485.

Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy.

Government Regulation Number 46 of 2020 concerning Requirements and Procedures for Recording Patent Transfers.

Helfianti, Sutri, and Iskandar Iskandar. “Manfaat, Prosedur Dan Kendala Pendaftaran Hak Milik Intelektual.” Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam 12, no. 1 (January 12, 2018): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v12i1.131.

Hendriyani, I Gusti Ayu Dewi. “Siaran Pers: Menparekraf: Ekonomi Kreatif Perkuat Capaian Target Indonesia Emas 2045,” Agustus 2023. https://kemenparekraf.go.id/berita/siaran-pers-menparekraf-ekonomi-kreatif-perkuat-capaian-target-indonesia-emas-2045.

Hendriyani, I Gusti Ayu Dewi. “Siaran Pers: Wamenparekraf Sampaikan Kebangkitan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia Dalam WCIF 2023 Di Daegu, Korea Selatan,” June 15, 2023. https://www.kemenparekraf.go.id/berita/siaran-pers-wamenparekraf-sampaikan-kebangkitan-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia-dalam-wcif-2023-di-daegu-korea-selatan.

Husny, Tengku Habib Ihza. “Tantangan Dalam Implementasi Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Pembiayaan Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 7, no. 3 (2023): 2335–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i3.5339.

Karelina, Natalia, Lastuti Abubakar, and Tri Handayani. “Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019 dan Penegasannya Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dan Perumusan Klausula Perjanjian.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan dan ke-PPAT-an 5, no. 2 (June 30, 2022): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.738.

Kawung, Zefanya Junita. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Hak Cipta yang Dapat Dijadikan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 16 Angka (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2014.” Lex Privatum 7, no. 2 (October 21, 2019): 84–90. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/25894.

Khakim, Haydar, and Widhi Handoko. “Studi Komparasi Kebijakan Pengaturan Desain Industri Di Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan Dalam Prespektif Pembaharuan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” Notarius 15, no. 1 (April 30, 2022): 440–58. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46053.

Kurnianingrum, Trias Palupi. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 8, no. 1 (2017): 31–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i1.936.

Kurniawan, I Gede Agus. “Valuasi Merek sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Relevansi dalam Pembentukan Lembaga Penilai Kekayaan Intelektual.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 9, no. 4 (December 31, 2020): 767. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p08.

Labetubun, Muchtar A. H., and Sabri Fataruba. “Peralihan Hak Cipta Kepada Ahli Waris Menurut Hukum Perdata.” SASI 22, no. 2 (2016): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.163.

Lastuti Abubakar, Dewi Kania Sugiharti, and Tri Handayani, “Aspek Hukum Jaminan: Kesiapan Perbankan dalam Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual bagi Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif”, RKDU Unpad (2023): 15.

Malany, Fenessa, Abdul Halim Barkatullah, and Rachmadi Usman. “Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Wasaka Hukum 10, no. 2 (August 2022): 215–28. https://ojs.stihsa-bjm.ac.id/index.php/wasaka/article/view/82.

Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy. “Subsektor Ekonomi Kreatif,” November 26, 2023. https://kemenparekraf.go.id/layanan/Subsektor-Ekonomi-Kreatif.

Murniati, Rilda. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pengalihan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dibidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 3 (2010): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v4no3.271.

Nugraha, Raditya Adi. “Tarik menarik antara aktor negara dan non negara dalam penerapan rezim internasional tentang lisensi software (studi kasus MoU Microsoft - RI).” Magister Thesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2010. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=135803&lokasi=lokal#.

Ott, Patrick Oliver. “UNCITRAL – United Nations Commission On International Trade Law.” In A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations, edited by Helmut Volger, 692–96. Brill | Nijhoff, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004180048.i-962.595.

Regulation of Minister of Finance Number 122 Year 2023 concerning Auction Implementation Instructions.

Rizki, Mochamad Januar. “HKI Sebagai Jaminan Utang, Ini Aspek-Aspek Hukum Yang Perlu Dicermati.” Hukum Online, September 2, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hki-sebagai-jaminan-utang--ini-aspek-aspek-hukum-yang-perlu-dicermati-lt6311b3f59522d/?page=2.

Rizkia, Nanda Dwi, and Hardi Fardiansyah. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual : Suatu Pengantar. Edited by Evi Damayanti. Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada, 2022.

Santosa, Aman. “Siaran Pers SP 40/GKPB/OJK/IV/2023. Sinergi Mendukung Penggunaan Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Agunan Kredit,” April 4, 2023. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Sinergi-Mendukung-Penggunaan-Kekayaan-Intelektual--Sebagai-Agunan-Kredit.aspx.

Simatupang, Taufik H. “Sistem Hukum Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 17, no. 2 (June 15, 2017): 195. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.195-208.

Sugiharti, Dewi Kania, I Gde Pantja Astawa, Rusdin Tahir, Agus Widjajanto, Mompang L. Panggabean, Moh. Mujibur Rohman, Ni Putu Paramita Dewi, et al. Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum: Suatu Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik. Jambi: Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.

Sutriyanti, Sutriyanti. “Pengaturan Ekonomi Kreatif Guna Mengembangkan Sumber Ekonomi Baru.” Journal Kajian 22, no. 4 (December 2017): 269–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/kajian.v22i4.3915.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia. Ed. 1, cet.1. Bandung: Alumni, 2003.

Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Vendu Reglement Staatsblad 1908 : 189.

Wicaksono, Setiawan. “Keabsahan Perjanjian Pinjaman Melalui Penyelenggara Teknologi Finansial Tidak Terdaftar.” Law Review XXI, no. 1 (July 2021): 72–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i0.3275.

World Intellectual Property Organization. Unlocking IP-Backed Financing: Country Perspectives. Unknown. Accessed November 10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.34667/TIND.44582.

Yunaz, Haswan, Syamsul Bachri, Nita Fauziah Oktaviani, Lucky Nugroho, Soeharjoto, Dudi Septiadi, Debbie Aryani Tribudhi, Komarruzaman, Zul Rachmat, and Muliyati. Ekonomi Kreatif. Edited by Ari Yanto and Diana Purnama Sari. Cet. 1. Padang: Global Eksekutif Teknologi, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30