Dynamics of regime failure: Regime power analysis China-ASEAN illicit drug control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v7i1.23398Keywords:
ASEAN, China, illicit drugs, international security regimeAbstract
The East and Southeast Asian region confronts complex challenges in combating the illicit drug trade originating from the Golden Triangle, a long-established narcotics trade hub. In 2000, China and ASEAN countries cooperated through the ACCORD as a comprehensive framework of regional drug control. However, the increasing number of methamphetamine seizures and the rise of new psychoactive substances indicate persistent challenges in the power of ACCORD's drug control regime. Hence, this study aims to analyze the ASEAN- China cooperation framework, particularly in the context of regime power formation. The concept of the International Security Regime is utilized to understand the complexity of the regime by integrating four dimensions of power, namely productive, structural, institutional, and compulsory. Through a qualitative approach and secondary analysis, this study reveals complex dynamics that affect the effectiveness of regional cooperation from the existing literature. First, productive power faces significant challenges due to intra-regional diversity, complex bilateral relations, and the declarative nature of ACCORD. Second, structural power is compromised due to power asymmetries and deep contestation. Third, institutional power suffers from significant weaknesses due to flawed institutional design. Fourth, compulsory power suffers because China's ability to exercise compulsion power directly, such as through sanctions or pressure, is limited within the multilateral framework of ACCORD. Therefore, cooperation needs to strengthen the network of normative discourse, political structures, and institutions, which affects the power drugs control regime. This paper successfully highlights the weaknesses in the power of the ASEAN-China-constructed international security regime.
References
Allison, L., & Taylor, M. (2017). ASEAN’s ‘people-oriented’ aspirations: civil society influences on non-traditional security governance. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1135870
ASEAN. (2000). Press Release of ASEAN and China on a Joint Regional Plan to Achieve a Drug-Free ASEAN by 2015 Bangkok, Thailand, 13 October 2000.
ASEAN. (2021). A Compilation of ASEAN Declarations , Joint Declarations , and Statements on Combating Transnational Crime and Terrorism Specialised Programmes Unit Office of Coordination Bureau for External Relations and Coordination The ASEAN Secretariat Association of. ASEAN SecretariaT.
Becker, S., Bryman, A., Ferguson, H., & Ferguson, T. H. (2012). Understanding research for social policy and social work: themes, methods and approaches. policy press.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Camilleri, J. A. (2003). Regionalism in the new Asia-Pacific order. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chen, S. (2013). Environmental cooperation in the South China Sea: Factors, actors and mechanisms. Ocean and Coastal Management, 85, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.004
Colson, R., & Bergeron, H. (2020). Western and Central Europe: towards a cohesive model for drug policies? Research Handbook on International Drug Policy, 94–112. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117067.00015
Coyne, J. (2022). Countering the synthetic-drug market in South East Asia. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.
Emmers, R. (2007). International regime-building in ASEAN: Cooperation against the illicit trafficking and abuse of drugs. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(3), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs29-3g
Gould, A. (2017). Global assemblages and counter-piracy: public and private in maritime policing. Policing and Society, 27(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1072180
Harper, N., & Tempra, N. (2020). Drug trafficking in the Golden Triangle: The Myanmar problem and ASEAN effectiveness. Jurnal Sentris, 1(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v1i1.4171.116-124
Hidayat, M. N. (2020). Aspek Pilihan Rasional Dan Efektifitas Dalam Pembentukan Asean And China Cooperative Operations In Response To Dangerous Drugs (ACCORD). Interdependence Journal of International Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54144/ijis.v1i1.18
Hynek, N. (2018). Theorizing international security regimes: A power-analytical approach. International Politics, 55(3–4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0084-2
Lamont, C. (2020). Research methods in politics and international relations. SAGE Publications.
Lu, X., & Zhang, J. (2011). The status of Lao’s participation in regional and sub-regional economic cooperation. Yunnan University Press.
Mirasol, J. D. B. (2017). Cooperation with China on the Philippines’ war on drugs. Foreign Service Institute.
Nauvarian, D., & Pramudia, P. S. (2022). A Long Walk for Nothing? ASEAN’s Ineffectiveness in Combating Transnational Organized Crime: The Case of Drug Trafficking in the “Golden Triangle.” Journal ASEAN Dynamics and Beyond, 3(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.20961/aseandynamics.v3i1.52678
Pardo, B., Kilmer, B., & Huang, W. (2019). Contemporary Asian Drug Policy: Insights and Opportunities for Change. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr2733
Prayuda, R., & Warsito, T. (2021). Problems faced by ASEAN in dealing with transnational drug smuggling in Southeast Asia region. Foresight, 23(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-12-2019-0106
Prayuda, R., Warsito, T., & Surwandono, S. (2019). Narcotics Smuggling Routes in the Southeast Asia Region (Case Study in the Riau Province, Indonesia). Security Dimensions, 30(30), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.7799
Sen, S. (1991). Heroin Trafficking in the Golden Triangle. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 64(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x9106400310
Sheng, L. (2006). China-ASEAN cooperation against illicit drugs from the golden triangle. Asian Perspective, 30(2), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2006.0022
Sukma, R. (2013). A growing force: Civil society’s role in Asian regional security. Japan Center for International Exchange.
UNODC. (2015). Drug-Free ASEAN 2015: Status and Recommendations.
UNODC. (2019). UNODC report: East and Southeast Asian synthetic drug supply remains at extreme levels and diversifies.
UNODC. (2024). Synthetic drugs in East and South East Asia. In UNODC.
Wang, W., Bai, Y., Xu, J., & Li, T. (2025). Collaborative governance of China-ASEAN maritime drug control: Mechanisms, challenges, and improvements. Ocean and Coastal Management, 261, 107548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107548
Wibisono, A. A. (2017). ASEAN-China Non-Traditional Security Cooperation and the Inescapability of the Politics of Security. Jurnal GLobal & Strategis, 11(1), 39–54.
Wirawan, M., & Novikrisna, D. (2024). Legal Instrument Under the “ASEAN Way”: The Case of ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol22.1.1726
Wulandari, S. A., & Kirana, P. (2023). ASEAN States Cooperation in the Control and Prevention of Illicit Drugs Trafficking. Yuridika, 38(3), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.44872
Xu, L., Yang, Z., Chen, J., Zou, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and spillover effects of carbon emissions from shipping trade in EU coastal countries. Ocean and Coastal Management, 250, 107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107029
Zhang, Y., Li, D., Fan, C., Xu, H., & Hou, X. (2021). Southeast Asia island coastline changes and driving forces from 1990 to 2015. Ocean and Coastal Management, 215(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105967
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Huang Yongjin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.
_-_Copy.jpg)
