Legal Protection For Cessionaris Of Fiduciary Collateral Objects In The Form Of Receivables Through Cessie As A Form Of Transfer Of Taxable Goods

Authors

  • Sudargo Tandiono Faculty of Law, Narotama University of Surabaya
  • Indrati Rini Faculty of Law, Narotama University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v8i2.21664

Keywords:

Fiduciary, collateral, Cessionari, Cessie, Taxable goods

Abstract

The existence of a collateral object is intended as a form of protection for creditors if the debtor experiences delinquency, which makes it easier for creditors to collect repayment from the collateral object. However, in terms of the object of collateral in the form of accounts receivable, how valid is it as a form of transfer through a cessie. The normative legal approach using the statute approach is applied in the research methodology of this research. The results of the analysis show that the parties most at risk in transferring fiduciary collateral with objects of receivables through a cessie are Cedents (old creditors) and Cessionaris (new creditors). On the other hand, even though there is destruction of the collateral object on the transferred receivable due to payment by the debtor, the tax that has been credited cannot be adjusted in value. Therefore, it is very detrimental for cedents and cessionaries to deal with these problems.

References

Adistie, Novelia, and Jarkasi Anwar. “Hubungan Keabsahan Pengalihan Piutang (Cessie) Yang Dilakukan Secara Berulang Kali Terhadap Perpindahan Hak Tanggungan Milik Debitur.” Yustisia Tirtayasa 1, no. 4 (2021): 93–117.

Ashibly. Buku Ajar Hukum Jaminan. Bengkulu: MIH Unihaz, 2018.

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional. Bandung: Alumni, 2022.

Diharini. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Piutang Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus) Pada Bank BCA Cabang Depok.” Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

Eka, Rina. “Konsep Peralihan Jaminan Prefensial Dalam Cessie.” Badamai Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2021): 130–49. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v6i1.11756.

Fitriana, Diana, and Abdul Wahid. “Upaya Hukum Cessionaris Terhadap Hak Tagih Atas Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Pengalihan Hutang ( Cessie ).” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 7, no. 2 (2021): 243–62.

Hadjon, Philipus M., and Tatiek Sri Djamiati. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2005.

Hariri, Wawan Muhwan. Hukum Perikatan: Dilengkapi Hukum Perikatan Dalam Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2011.

HS, Salim, and Erlies Septiana Nurbani. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Logor, Ribka Josevira, Harijanto Sabijono, and Stanly W. Alexander. “Evaluasi Perlakuan Akuntansi Atas Piutang Tak Tertagih Pada PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Cabang Manado.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi 15, no. 3 (2020): 521–26. https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.15.3.30175.2020.

Ma’rifah, Nurul. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2022): 204–26. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.23.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Muzaki, Ilham, and Aris Machmud. “Prosedur Pengalihan Cessie Dalam Perspektif Hukum” 12, no. 1 (2023): 143–59. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.503.

Sahputra, Syahron. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit.” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 8, no. 1 (2020): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v8i1.1650.

Sanusi, Kus Rizkianto, and Imam Asmarudin. Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia. Brebes: Diya Media Group, 2017.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hak Tanggungan (Asas-Asas, Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Dan Masalah Yang Dihadapi Oleh Perbankan),. Bandung: Alumni, 1999.

Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen. Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1981.

Suharnoko, and Endah Hartati. Dokrin Subrogasi, Novasi, Dan Cessie (Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Perdata, Nieuw Nederlands Burgerlijk Wetboek, Code Civil Prancis Dan Comman Law. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.

Widodo, Sri. “Kewenangan Mengadili Terhadap Sengketa Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pokok (Akad Syariah) Dan Perjanjian Accesoir (APHT) Akibat Pilihan Hukum Yang Berbeda (Studi Putusan Nomor 499/Pdt.g/2021/Pa.Yk Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Yogyakarta).” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-17