The indonesian grammatical interference on EFL students’ writing

Ayu Rizki Septiana


This research was aimed to find out what factors of the occurrence of Indonesian grammar interference in EFL students’ writing and what type of Indonesian grammar interference occur in EFL students’ writing. To answer the research problem on Indonesian grammatical interference, a descriptive qualitative was done by taking the fourth semester students of English Department STKIP PGRI Tulungagung as the subject of the research. Further, the data related to the Indonesian grammar interference were taken using test and observation. The result of data analysis shows that the students still got interference from Indonesian grammar as their native language. The grammatical interference in this research is classified into two; syntactical interference and morphological interference. The syntactical interference consists of word order, preposition, extra word and missing word. The most interference in syntactical interference is on preposition. The morphological interference consists of omission of determiner, wrong determiner, subject-verb agreement, be form, tenses usage, singular and plural form. The most interference in morphological interference is omission of determiner. From the observation, it was found that the cause of interference is the different structure of Indonesian and English grammar. Moreover, the students usually wrote it first in Indonesian and later translated into English.


Indonesian grammatical interference; EFL writing; L1 and L2 differences; descriptive qualitative

Full Text:



Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.

Ary, D., Lucy, C. J. &Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8thEdition). Belmont:Wadsworth.

Berg, B.L (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. California; Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education,Inc.

Chitravelu, N. (2007). ELT Methodology Principles & Practice (second edition). Malaysia: Oxford Fajar.

Creswell John W. 2012. Research Design Edition Qualitative, Quantitave and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th Edition. London: Sage Publication.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York:Oxford UniversityPress.

Hedge,T.(2005).Writing. London: Oxford UniversityPress.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Melbourne: Cambridge. University Press.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Irmalia, M. (2016). Indonesian Interference in Students’ Writing. English Education Journal, 7 (4), 498-508. Retrieved from

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Martanti, P. (2011). An analysis of grammatical interference in articles of Berani Newspaper. (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta, Jakarta,Indonesia). Retrieved

Naidu, M. 2(007). The Use of Written Feedback and Conferencing in Improving Students’ Writing. Retrieved from http://eprtp://

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing (Third Edition). United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Pudiyono. (2012).Indonesian grammatical interference toward the students’ spoken and written English. International Journal of Educational Studies, 4 (2), 229-244. Retrieved

from http://www/

Richards,J.,Platt,J.,Weber,H., & Inman, P. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London:Pearson.

Septiana, A.R., Sulistyo, G.H.,Kadarisman, A.E. (2016). Corrective feedback and writingaccuracyacrossdifferentlevelsof grammatical sensitivity. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 1- 11.

Shahin,N.(2011).Error Treatmentin TESOL Classroom. Jordan Journal of Applied Science: Humanities Series, 13 (1)., 207-226. Retrieved from HumanitiesSeries.pdf.

Suwito. (1983). Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik Teori dan Praktik. Surakarta: Henary Offset.

Weinrich, U. 1953. Language in Contact: Finding and Problems. New York: Mouton Publishers.

Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K.F. (2012). ‘Triangulation’ research methods as the tools of social science research. BUP Journal, 1 (1), 154-163.

Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language (4th Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL) is indexed by


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License