Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Inggris Dengan Jerman (Refleksi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Dan Penerapan Hukum Indonesia)

Authors

  • Manotar Tampubolon Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia
  • Putu George Matthew Simbolon Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.11114

Keywords:

Stare Decisis, Common Law, Civil Law, Reflection, Indonesian Law

Abstract

This article explains the differences and similarities between the British legal system and German Law and reflects their application to Indonesian law which was influenced by the swift flow of legalism. The writing uses a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach. Authors use English common law sources along with their application and German civil law along with their application under the stuffenbau theory. The difference between these legal systems is the common law system prioritizes precedent application, while the civil law system prioritizes statutes. Furthermore, these systems also have similarities whereas both systems are applying customs, doctrines, and legal interpretations as to their complementary legal instruments. The authors address that Indonesia needs to apply methods beyond the statute approach, and Indonesia shall take into account customs, doctrines, and interpretations to achieve justice.

Author Biography

Manotar Tampubolon, Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia

Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia

References

Jurnal

Edward L. Glaeser dan A. Shleifer, (November, 2002), Legal Origins, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 117, Nomor 4.

Edwardx J. Eberle, (Januari, 2009), The Method and Role of the Comparative Law, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Volume 8, Nomor 3.

Yannick Radi, (Januari, 2013), The ‘Human Nature’ of International Investment Law, Grotius Centre Working Paper, Volume 10, Nomor 006-IEL.

Internet

ASEAN Law Association, (2019), Category Archives: Legal System, Diakses pada hari Rabu Tanggal 27 Januari 2021, Dari aseanlawassociation.com: https://www.aseanlawassociation.org/category/legal-system/

Lawyers Germany, (21 Agustus 2021), Civil Law in Germany, Diakses pada 25 Agustus 2021, dari LawyersGermany.com: https://www.lawyersgermany.com/civil-law-in-germany

Max Rheinstein, (2021), The German System, Diakses pada 31 Maret 2021, dari Britannica.com.: https://www.britannica.com/topic/civil-law-Romano-Germanic/The-German-system.

Buku

Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, (2018), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Depok; Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fajlurahman Jurdi, (2016), Teori Negara Hukum, Malang; Setara Press.

Gozali dan Djoni Sumardi, (2008), Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum, (Civil Law, Common Law, dan Hukum Adat), Bandung; Nusa Media.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2006), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta; Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

_____, (2020), Teori Hierarki Norma Hukum, Jakarta; Penerbit Konstitusi Press.

Muhammad Junaidi, (2018), Hukum Konstitusi: Pandangan dan Gagasan Modernisasi Negara Hukum, Depok; Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muhammad Rustamaji, (2017), Pilar-Pilar Hukum Progresif: Menyelami Pemikiran Satjipto Rahardjo, Yogyakarta; Thafa Media.

Peter De Cruz., (1999), Comparative Law in a Changing World, London-Sydney; Cavendish Publishing Limited.

R. Soeroso, (2010), Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, Jakarta; Sinar Grafika.

Sardjono, (1985), Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, Jakarta; Materi Kuliah, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Satjipto Rahardjo, (1986), Ilmu Hukum, Bandung; Penerbit Alumni.

The Robbins Collection, (2010), The Common and Civil Law Tradition, Oxford; The Robbins Collection, Educational Use Only.

Umar Said Sugiarto, (2013), Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta; Sinar Grafika.

Zairin Harahap, (1997), Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Edisi Revisi, Depok; RajaGrafindo Persada.

Additional Files

Published

22.06.2022

How to Cite

Tampubolon, Manotar, and Putu George Matthew Simbolon. 2022. “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Inggris Dengan Jerman (Refleksi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Dan Penerapan Hukum Indonesia)”. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 5 (2):141-62. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.11114.