Perceptions of teachers and students on the application of testportal for TOEIC practice testing

Authors

  • Dien Novita Politeknik LP3I Bandung https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5186-1797
  • Gina Yulistiati Politeknik LP3I Bandung
  • Santy Christinawati Universitas Nasional Pasim Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v4i2.20124

Keywords:

summative assessment, testportal, TOEIC

Abstract

Assessment has always been an important part of education. However, with the recent advent and popularity of online education, teachers must devise new methods and tools for engaging online learners in examinations. Regrettably, there are limited applications available to be implemented quickly on flexible assessments. The purpose of this study is to discover how teachers and students understand this online assessment program, Testportal, for summative assessment. This is a mixed-method study. Three English teachers and 70 students from three English 1 sessions were recruited and agreed to participate in the study. A closed questionnaire, interviews, and nonparticipatory observation were used to collect data. The findings revealed that teachers' and students' perceptions of the Testportal's use were positive. The biggest obstacles that teachers and students experience when accessing Testportal are slow internet connections and teachers' difficulty in operating digital examinations. The challenges that prohibit language teachers from incorporating technology for assessment objectives originate from a lack of rules for planning, technology training, practice, and school and student equipment. Language instructors with understanding of technology and assistance from related sources should be given the opportunity to put their knowledge into practice, be watched by teacher educators, and receive feedback on their progress. The Testportal provided teachers with up-to-date information regarding online exams that support students' learning processes through dynamic assessment feedback cycles, such as teaching, assessing, and modifying different instructions to fit students' learning needs.

Author Biographies

Dien Novita, Politeknik LP3I Bandung

 

 

Gina Yulistiati, Politeknik LP3I Bandung

 

 

Santy Christinawati, Universitas Nasional Pasim Bandung, Indonesia

 

 

References

Alharbi, A. S., & Meccawy, Z. (2020). Introducing Socrative as a tool for formative assessment in Saudi EFL classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 372-384. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.23

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34-37. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008

Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), pp228-236. Retrieved on January 21, 2022, from https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1730

Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2). DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467

Cassady, J. C., & Gridley, B. E. (2005). The Effects of online formative and summative assessment on test anxiety and performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(1). Retrieved on February, 11, 2023, from https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1648

Cirit, N. C. (2015). Assessing ELT pre-service teachers via Web 2.0 tools: Perceptions toward traditional, online and alternative assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(3), 9-19. Retrieved on January, 02, 2023, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i3/1432.pdf

Creswell, John & Guetterman, Timothy. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition. Pearson

Gilbert, L., Whitelock, D., & Gale, V. (2011). Synthesis report on assessment and feedback with technology enhancement. Retrieved on July, 01, 2023, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1512614.pdf

Hanson, J. M., & Mohn, L. (2011). Assessment trends: A ten-year perspective on the uses of a general education assessment. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 23(5), 1–15. DOI: 10.1002/au.235

Hewson, C. (2012). Can online course-based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 488–498. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00473.x

Ismail, M. A. A., & Mohammad, J. A. M. (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in medicine journal, 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2017.9.2.2

Khairil, L. F., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018). 21st century assessment: online assessment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 659-672. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3838

Khan, S., & Khan, R. A. (2019). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 661-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0

Nurkancana, W. Sunartana. (1992). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Surabaya, Usaha Nasional.

Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2002). Supporting student learning: The use of computer–based formative assessment modules. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515-523.

Perera-Diltz, D. M., & Moe, J. L. (2014). Formative and summative assessment in online education. Journal of research in innovative teaching, 7(1). Retrieved on May, 16, 2022, from https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/chs_pubs/37

Robertson, S. N., Humphrey, S. M., & Steele, J. P. (2019). Using technology tools for formative assessments. Journal of Educators Online, 16(2), n2. Retrieved on March, 17, 2023, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223780

Sudarsana, I. K., Nakayanti, A. R., Sapta, A., Haimah, Satria, E., Saddhono, K., & Mursalin, M. (2019, November). Technology application in education and learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1363, No. 1, p. 012061). IOP Publishing.

Suryani, A. (2010). ICT in education: Its benefits, difficulties, and organizational development issues. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 3(1), 13-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v3i1.651

Stewart, B.L., Waight, C.L., Norwood, M.M. & Ezell, S.D. (2004). Formative and summative evaluation of online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(2), 101-109. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106730/

Yoestara, M., Putri, Z., Keumala, M., & Idami, Z. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ perception towards online assessment method. International Journal of Education, Language, and Religion, 2(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v2i1.1933

Downloads

Published

2023-07-06

How to Cite

Novita, D., Yulistiati, G., & Christinawati, S. (2023). Perceptions of teachers and students on the application of testportal for TOEIC practice testing. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 4(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v4i2.20124