Beyond Inclusion: Deconstructing the Privilege Paradigm in Gender Equality Initiatives within Higher Education and Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/multikultural.v8i2.25387Keywords:
Privilege Paradigm, Gender Equality, Higher Education, Intersectionality, Systematic Barriers, InclusionAbstract
Despite widespread gender equality initiatives in higher education, systemic disparities persist. Traditional inclusion policies often fail because they overlook entrenched privilege dynamics that sustain institutional inequities. This study critically analyzes how privilege paradigms undermine gender equality efforts in higher education and research, and offers actionable recommendations for dismantling these structural barriers. Employing a qualitative thematic analysis, this study synthesizes peer-reviewed journal articles, books, institutional policies, and organizational reports. The analysis integrates intersectionality, critical theory, feminist, postcolonial, and queer theory to examine the invisibility of privilege, the role of institutional culture, and the limitations of inclusion-focused policies. Findings reveal four dominant themes: (1) patriarchal and cultural norms persistently restrict women’s access and leadership; (2) systemic barriers in hiring, promotion, and STEM fields perpetuate gender bias; (3) legal milestones like Title IX show uneven benefits across race and class; and (4) privilege awareness remains low, with men’s engagement often reinforcing rather than challenging gender hierarchies. Intersectionality proves essential for understanding how race, class, and gender compound inequality. Moving beyond token inclusion requires systemic interventions: institutionalizing intersectionality into policy, fostering critical reflective pedagogy, and reframing privilege as a structural rather than individual issue. Future research should incorporate empirical case studies to further illuminate privilege dynamics across diverse cultural contexts.
References
Austin, D. E. J., Marques, M. D., & Stukas, A. A. (2024). Anti‐egalitarianism motivates denial of male privilege. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12424
Cerezo, A., Cummings, M., Holmes, M., & Williams, C. (2020). Identity as resistance: Identity formation at the intersection of race, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319875977
Chan, C. D., Steen, S., Howard, L. C., & Ali, A. I. (2019). Disentangling the complexities of queer theory and intersectionality theory: Research paradigms and insights for social justice. Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education (pp. 59–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_5
Chan, K., Spaid Miedema, S., Naved, R. T., & Yount, K. M. (2023). Beyond girls’ education: Pathways to women’s post-marital education in matlab, Bangladesh. Feminist Economics, 29(1), 38–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2082510
Chen, X. (2023a). Analysis of the roles of men in gender equality: A case study of China. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 4(1), 755–761. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/4/2022320
Chen, X. (2023b). Analysis of the roles of men in gender equality: A case study of China. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 4(1), 755–761. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/4/2022320
Chiang, L.-H. N., & Song, Y. C. (2020). Practicing feminist geography in Taiwan. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(4), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1608914
Cin, F. M., & Karlidağ-Dennis, E. (2021). Gender equality in basic education: Feminist constructions of the EU. Gender and Politics (pp. 229–249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52770-9_11
Gomez, A. M. (2020). “The job is yours!” Deconstructing the gender gap in higher education. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 23(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458920903084
Hakiem, R. A. D. (2022). Advancement and subordination of women academics in Saudi Arabia’s higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1528–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1933394
Laster Pirtle, W. N. (2020). Racial capitalism: A fundamental cause of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic inequities in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120922942
Laster Pirtle, W. N., & Wright, T. (2021). Structural gendered racism revealed in pandemic times: Intersectional approaches to understanding race and gender health inequities in COVID-19. Gender and Society, 35(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211001302
Leonard, C., & Violo, V. (2021). Gender equality in gambling student funding: A brief report. Critical Gambling Studies, 2(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs59
Liu, J. (2023). Analysis of the roles of men in gender equality issues. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 4(1), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/4/20220239
Marcus, J. (2022). Intersectional effects of age, gender, and social class on successful aging at work. Age and Work (pp. 63–79). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089674-6
Medina, T. (2023). Actual problems of gender management in higher education institution. Economies’ Horizons, 4(26), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.31499/2616-5236.4(26).2023.293236
Pease, B. (2020). From privileged irresponsibility to shared responsibility for social injustice. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Pedagogies for Social Work (pp. 165–175). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351002042-14
Pickett, M. W., Dawkins, M. P., & Braddock, J. H. (2012). Race and gender equity in sports. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(11), 1581–1603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458282
Risman, B. J. (2018). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Doing Gender Diversity: Readings in Theory and Real-World Experience, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500930
Roper, R. L. (2019). Does gender bias still affect women in science? Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 83(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00018-19
Schwiter, K., Nentwich, J., & Keller, M. (2021). Male privilege revisited: How men in female‐dominated occupations notice and actively reframe privilege. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(6), 2199–2215. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12731
Sengupta, M., & Harris, L. M. (2022). Interrogating differences: Intersectionality and participatory livelihood development in the upland forest of Tripura (Northeast India). Geoforum, 130, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.02.002
Stevenson, B. (2007). Title ix and the evolution of high school sports. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25(4), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00080.x
Tuy, S. (2019). Discrimination against women in accessing higher education in Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 3(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v3i1.8402
Van Laar, C., Van Rossum, A., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Bongiorno, R., & Block, K. (2024a). Mandatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1263313
Van Laar, C., Van Rossum, A., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Bongiorno, R., & Block, K. (2024b). Mandatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1263313
Xu, C., Mussagulova, A., & Zhou, Q. (2024). The role of gender equality in advancing development. Public Administration and Development, 44(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2042
Yan, D., Sunindijo, R. Y., & Wang, C. C. (2024). Analysis of gender diversity initiatives to empower women in the Australian construction industry. Buildings, 14(6), 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061707
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mufidul Abror
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
