Comparison of Students' Mathematical Concept Understanding Ability in Polyhedron Material Using the Discovery Learning and Core Learning Model with The Assistance of Pop-Up Book Media

Authors

  • Inanda Shofa Azahroh UIN Saizu Purwokerto
  • Fitria Zana Kumala UIN Saizu Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v10i1.20359

Keywords:

Discovery learning, CORE, pop-up book, Mathematical Concept Understanding

Abstract

This research was motivated by the low ability of class VIII students at MTs N 1 Purbalingga to understand mathematical concepts. This research aims to compare students' ability to understand mathematical concepts in flat-sided geometric material using two different learning models, namely discovery learning and Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, And Extending (CORE) with the help of pop-up book media. The research method used is quantitative with a quasi-experimental type of research. The population in this study were class VIII students at MTs N 1 Purbalingga for the 2022/2023 academic year. The sampling technique used simple random sampling, and the sample in this study were students in classes VIII D and VIII E, totaling 76 students. In experimental class I, I received teaching using the discovery learning model assisted by pop-up books. For experimental class II, I received teaching using the CORE model assisted by pop-up books. The data collection method uses tests in the form of pretest and posttest. The data analysis technique uses the n-gain and two independent samples t-tests. The research results showed that the average n-gain score in experimental class I was 0.656; in experimental class II, it was 0.366, which was in the medium category. Judging from the n-gain interpretation, the average percentage value obtained by experimental class I, namely 65.5%, is interpreted as quite effective. It is interpreted as ineffective in experimental class II, namely 36.6%. Based on analysis using the t-test for two independent samples, the significance value was 0.000 < α=0.05, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students who use the pop-up book-assisted discovery learning model and the CORE assisted learning model on flat-sided building materials.

References

Abner, D., Avianty, D., & Sefaverdiana, P. V. (2021, November). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Pop Up Book pada Materi Bangun Ruang. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKIP Budi Utomo (Vol. 2, No. 01, pp. 38-44).

Adha, N. N. (2019). Comparison of CORE learning models (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) and reciprocal teaching on the reasoning and connection ability of class VII students of SMPN 1 Tanjung Morawa (Master's thesis, University).

Allen, M. R., & Kesumawati, N. S. (2018). Introduction to research statistics. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Aunurrahman. (2014). Learning and learning. Alfabeta.

Cahyo, A. (2013). Learning theory application guide. PT Diva Press.

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Mathematics education research. PT Refika Aditama.

Kusrianto, S. I., Suhito, S., & Wuryanto, W. (2016). Keefektifan model pembelajaran CORE berbantuan pop-up book terhadap kemampuan siswa kelas VIII pada aspek representasi matematis. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v5i2.12314

Maharani, H. R., Ubaidah, N., & Aminudin, M. (2018). Efektifitas Model Concept Attainment Ber-Budaya Akademik Islami Berbantuan Pop-Up Book pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(1), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.12693

Majid, A. F., Ismail, I., Mardhiah, M., & Nur, F. (2020). Perbandingan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang menggunakan metode silih tanya berbantuan kartu model dan metode make a match. Al Asma: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v2i1.12429

Martucilia, W., Agustinsa, R., & Utari, T. (2022). PERBANDINGAN MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN EKSPOSITORI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 6(2), 268-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.6.2.268-276

Yanti, R., Laswadi, L., Ningsih, F., Putra, A., & Ulandari, N. (2019). Penerapan pendekatan saintifik berbantuan geogebra dalam upaya meningkatkan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 180-194.

Putri, R. M., & Eliarti, W. (2017). Perbandingan model pembelajaran core dengan discovery learning dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan self-regulated learning siswa SMA. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v2i2.605

Sari, N. E., & Suryana, D. (2019). Thematic pop-up book as a learning media for early childhood language development. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 13(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.21009/10.21009/JPUD.131.04

Surur, M., & Oktavia, S. T. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 6(1), 11-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v6i1.341

Suyatno. (2009). Exploring innovative learning. Masmedia Buana Pustaka.

Syah, M. (2014). Educational psychology with a new approach. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wardhani, S. (2008). Analysis of SI and SKL mathematics subjects for SMP/MTs for optimizing achievement of goals. Center Development and Empowerment of Education and Education Personnel Mathematics.

Yuliani, E. N., Zulfah, Z., & Zulhendri, Z. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (Gi) terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kuok. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 91-100.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-08

How to Cite

Azahroh, I. S., & Kumala, F. Z. (2024). Comparison of Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding Ability in Polyhedron Material Using the Discovery Learning and Core Learning Model with The Assistance of Pop-Up Book Media. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 10(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v10i1.20359