Integrating AI literacy in solving linear programming problems: A study with prospective teachers using Madura Batik contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v11i2.24033Keywords:
Problem-solving, Linear Programming, Prospective Teachers, Artificial İntelligence Literacy, BatikAbstract
Linear programming is a crucial aspect of optimization mathematics. Prospective mathematics teachers are required to be proficient in solving linear programming problems using graphical methods, the simplex method, and computational technology. However, challenges such as modeling real-world problems, computational complexity, and difficulty understanding graphical visualizations often hinder understanding the material. This study aims to describe the solution of linear programming problems based on the local wisdom of Madurese batik, incorporating AI literacy tools such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Wolfram Alpha, and GeoGebra AI. This study employed a qualitative, descriptive approach. The subjects consisted of 23 prospective teachers, and three representative subjects were selected. The instruments used were a contextual problem of Madurese batik and an interview questionnaire. The results were analyzed and compared with the interview results. The results show that AI helps facilitate prospective teachers in solving linear programming problems. The research findings suggest that AI has transformative potential in mathematics learning for prospective teachers. AI improves efficiency, visual comprehension, flexibility, and confidence. However, challenges such as technological barriers and potential decreases in learning intensity need to be addressed through thoughtful pedagogical design. Prospective teachers must remain meticulous in problem-solving because AI can make mistakes. Prospective teachers may feel the need for intensive learning because problems can be easily solved by AI. AI should be viewed as a tool that supports exploration and understanding, not as a complete substitute for the learning process. Mathematics learning needs to integrate AI as an aid, not a replacement for manual skills.
References
https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd- 19.2019.92
Baidawi, M., Pertiwi, R. I., & Esti, E. A. J. (2020). Needs of students and lecturers on linear programming as an instructional strategy in solving national economic problems. Anatolian Journal of Education, 5(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2020.5212a
Barcaui, A. (2025). ChatGPT as a cognitive crutch: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial on knowledge retention. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102287
Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learn. Environ., 12. Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2017). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Contel, F., & Cusi, A. (2025). Investigating the role of ChatGPT in supporting metacognitive processes during problem-solving activities. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00164-7
Cukurova, M. (2024). The interplay of learning, analytics, and artificial intelligence in education: A vision for hybrid intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13514
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56, 281–292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023- 01530-2
GeoGebra. (n.d.). GeoGebra: Interactive mathematics learning tools. https://www.geogebra.org/
Heung, Y. M. E., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1969–1990.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Kapur, M. (2018). Productive Failure as a Method for Enhancing Learning.
Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317734354
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education.
Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2017). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Mah, D.-K., & Groß, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal Education Technology Higher Education, 21 Article 58.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Pepin, B., Buchholtz, N., & Salinas-Hernández, U. (2025). A scoping survey of ChatGPT in mathematics education. Digital Experience in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00172-1
Vanderbei, R. J. (2014). Linear programming: Foundations and extensions (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7630-6
Wolfram|Alpha. (n.d.). Wolfram|Alpha. https://www.wolframalpha.com/
Yohannes, A., & Chen, H.-L. (2023). GeoGebra in mathematics education: A systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environment, 31 (9), 5682-5697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Baidawi, Cynthia Tri Octavianti, Abdul Hamıd Bachtiar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



_-_Copy.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)