Children’s semiotic and multimodal meaning-making in numerical story problems

Authors

  • Sukmawati Firdaus Sagran Universitas Islam Malang
  • Sukmiyati Firdaus Sagran Universitas Islam Malang
  • Lisa Gildner Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v12i1.25275

Keywords:

Multimodality, Child Semiotics, Meaning-Making, Numerical Story Problems, Early Childhood Mathematics

Abstract

This study addresses a gap in early childhood mathematics research: while previous studies have largely emphasized number-symbol representation and correct answers, limited attention has been paid to children’s semiotic, multimodal, and meaning-making processes when solving numerical story problems. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation of children while working on numerical story problems, interviews with teachers regarding how children learn, and documentation of scribbles, drawings, and mathematical symbols produced by children. This study was conducted with 25 kindergarten children aged 5–6 years (Group B) at RA Anggrek. Data were collected through classroom observations, contextual interviews with children and teachers, and documentation of children’s drawings, scribbles, gestures, verbal counting, and mathematical symbols. The findings show that children predominantly used drawings as primary semiotic representations, accompanied by gestures, verbal counting, scribbles, and emerging use of number symbols. These modes did not appear separately; rather, they interacted dynamically as thinking tools in the children’s meaning-making process. The child's meaning-making process toward the signs they created shows that these representations function as thinking tools. From Vygotsky's perspective, the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) emerges when children transition from concrete to abstract thinking, whereas according to Piaget, children are in the preoperational stage, which still relies on concrete objects. This study highlights that children’s mathematical understanding develops through multimodal semiotic activity, not merely through formal symbols or final answers. Pedagogically, the findings suggest that early childhood numeracy instruction should provide space for drawing, moving, marking, and talking as legitimate parts of mathematical thinking.

References

Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446

Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9163-z

Azhari, T. S., & Indah, R. N. (2025). Early childhood vocabulary acquisition through multimodal strategies : a semiotic study of miss rachel. Aulad : Journal on Early Childhood, 8(3), 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v8i3.1195

Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2020). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Byrne, E. M., Jensen, H., Thomsen, B. S., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2023). Educational interventions involving physical manipulatives for improving children’s learning and development: A scoping review. Review of Education, 11(2), 3400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3400

Campbell, K., & Cunningham, A. E. (2025). Examining young children’s transitions from drawing into early writing. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 72, 317–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.04.007

Cartwright, K. (2023). Interpreting young children’s multiplicative strategies through their drawn representations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00450-4

Cartwright, K. (2024). Interpreting young children’s multiplicative strategies through their drawn representations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36, 367–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00450-4

Clements, D. H., Lizcano, R., & Sarama, J. (2023). Research and pedagogies for early math. Education Sciences, 13(8), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080839

Congdon, E. L., & Levine, S. C. (2023). Unlocking the power of gesture: using movement-based ınstruction to ımprove first grade children’s spatial unit misconceptions. Journal of Intelligence (Vol. 11, Issue 10, p. 200). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100200

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.

Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton & Company.

Deguara, J., & Nutbrown, C. (2018). Signs, symbols and schemas: understanding meaning in a child’s drawings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1369398

Fitria, N., Wahyuningsih, S., & Hafidah, R. (2022). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis bermain pada anak usia dini: Kajian konseptual. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 3185–3196. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2254

Gil, P., Martínez, V., Toro, W., & Castañeda, W. (2025). Children’s Drawing and Graphic Development: An Empirical Study of the Developmental Stages According to Lowenfeld. Education Sciences, 15, 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060681

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning through gesture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.132

Graven, M., & Jorgensen, R. (2024). Early numeracy opportunities through number stories with marginalised families. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01537-9

Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics. Blackwell.

Kesselring, T., & Mueller, U. (2011). The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Liang, Z., Tay, L. O., & Dennis, S. (2026). Private speech: similarities between a large language model and children. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1691074

Liu, T., Gomez, G., & Shipman, F. M. (2025). Investigating children’s multimodal enactment in digitally augmented tabletop storytelling. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 46, 100770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100770

Longobardi, C., Quaglia, R., & Iotti, N. O. (2015). Reconsidering the scribbling stage of drawing: a new perspective on toddlers’ representational processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01227

Marwaha, S., Goswami, M., & Vashist, B. (2017). Prevalence of Principles of Piaget’s Theory Among 4-7-year-old Children and their Correlation with IQ. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR, 11(8), ZC111–ZC115. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/28435.10513

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.

Missall, K., Mercer, S. H., Martinez, R. S., & Casebeer, D. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal patterns and trends in performance on early numeracy curriculum-based measures in kindergarten through third grade. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413489724

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Monteira, S. F., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Martins, I. (2024). Cultural semiotic resources in young children’s science drawings. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10214-6

Munn, P. (1998). Number symbols and symbolic function in preschoolers. C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 47–71). Psychology Press.

Mustofa, M., Jamil, A., & Ulum, B. (2021). Pengaruh bercerita terhadap kemampuan numerasi anak usia 5-6 tahun. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 9(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v9i2.35421

Nichols, D. L., Neal, T., & Hand, B. (2025). A hierarchical typology of multimodal scientific writing in early primary grades. Frontiers in Communication, Volume 10-2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1603737

Outhwaite, L. A., Aunio, P., Leung, J. K. Y., & Van Herwegen, J. (2024). Measuring mathematical skills in early childhood: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of early maths assessments and screeners. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09950-6

Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Early numerical competencies and students with mathematics difficulty. Focus on exceptional children, 44(5), 1–16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3756513/

Purpura, D. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Informal numeracy skills: the structure and relations among numbering, relations, and arithmetic operations in preschool. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212465332

Purwasih, R., Dahlan, J. A., & Irawan, E. (2023). Semiotic perspective in mathematics problem-solving. Journal of Didactic Studies Published, 1(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.17509/jds.v1i1.59022

Quane, K. (2025). The confluence of attitudes towards mathematics and pedagogical practice: Evaluating the use of mathematical manipulatives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37, 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00494-0

Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02

Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9127-3

Rahayu, P., & Hartati, S. (2022). Scaffolding dalam pembelajaran matematika anak usia dini berbasis pendekatan konstruktivisme. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 16(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.161.04

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.

Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.

Worthington, M., & Carruthers, E. (2003). Children’s mathematics: Making marks, making meaning. Paul Chapman Publishing.

Worthington, M., Dobber, M., & van Oers, B. (2019). The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09898-3

Worthington, M., Dobber, M., & van Oers, B. (2024). Intertextuality and the advance of mathematisation in young children’s inscriptions. Research Papers in Education, 39(5), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2023.2238286

Yilmaz, K. (2011). The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.568989

meaning-making in numerical story problems JPM

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Sagran, S. F., Sagran, S. F., & Gildner, L. (2026). Children’s semiotic and multimodal meaning-making in numerical story problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 12(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v12i1.25275