DAMPAK PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN STEM PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SEKOLAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v6i2.5299Keywords:
Dampak, Pendekatan STEM, MatematikaAbstract
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) diterapkan di berbagai sekolah karena pembelajaran ini melibatkan banyak aspek dalam kegiatan belajar matematika. Keterlibatan berbagai aspek tersebut dinilai mampu membantu siswa dalam belajar. Kesulitan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika begitu kompleks sehingga guru membutuhkan solusi yang mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut sesuai dengan kemajuan IPTEK saat ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak penerapan STEM pada pelajaran matematika di sekolah serta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode studi literatur. Penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai artikel, jurnal, buku, dan sumber lain terkait penerapan pendekatan STEM pada matematika di sekolah. Hasil dari kajian literatur menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan STEM memberikan dampak positif terhadap aspek kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotor. Dampak positif pada aspek kognitif ditandai dengan adanya peningkatan hasil belajar matematika pengetahuan kosakata matematika. Dampak positif pada aspek afektif ditunjukkan dengan adanya peningkatan perilaku atau afektif matematis dan dampak positif pada aspek psikomotor ditandai dengan adanya peningkatan kemampuan kreatifitas siswa. Meski begitu, ada beberapa faktor lainnya yang ikut mempengaruhi seperti kerja sama pemerintah daerah dengan sekolah, strategi yang tepat untuk mendukung populasi siswa yang begitu banyak, kebijakan negara, latar belakang ekonomi, suku bangsa, durasi waktu yang digunakan saat proses belajar mengajar, model pembelajaran, dan kebiasaan siswa dalam belajar matematika.References
Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem Based Learning: A Student-Centered Approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p73
Bicer, A., Boedeker, P., Capraro, R. M., Mary, M., The, M. M., Bicer, A., … Capraro, M. M. (2015). The Effects of STEM PBL on Students’ Mathematical and Scientific Vocabulary Knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2(2), 69-75–75.
Bicer, A., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Mathematics achievement in the secondary high school context of STEM and non-STEM schools. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321
Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Oner, T., & Boedeker, P. (2015). STEM Schools vs. Non-STEM Schools: Comparing Students’ Mathematics Growth Rate on High-Stakes Test Performance. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 138–150.
Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). STEM Schools vs. Non-STEM Schools: Comparing Students Mathematics State Based Test Performance. International Journal of Global Education, 3(3), 8–18.
Burk, J., Johnson, D., & Whitley, J. (2005). Validity of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS). Journal of Border Educational Research, 4(2), 29–40.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach. In Sense Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? In The Center for Evaluation and Monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.cem.org/what-makes-great-teaching-cobis-2016
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Ejiwale, J. A. (2013). Barriers To Successful Implementation of STEM Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.220
El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A
Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162
Idris, N., & Nor, N. M. (2010). Mathematical creativity: Usage of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.264
Isham, J. (2018). How should we prepare students to address the challenges of our time? Currents in Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 2–8. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/publications/explorations/15_3_2003.pdf
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Kiray, A., & Shelley, M. (2018). Research Highlights in STEM Education. In ISRES Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.isres.org/research-highlights-in-stem-education-7-b.html#.Xb7-ltUxXIU
Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2019). Affective Mathematics Engagement: a Comparison of STEM PBL Versus Non-STEM PBL Instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00050-0
Li, Y. (2018). Journal for STEM Education Research – Promoting the Development of Interdisciplinary Research in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0009-z
Mohr-Schroeder, M., Cavalcanti, M., & Blyman, K. (2015). Stem Education: Understanding the Changing Landscape. In Sense Publisher (pp. 3–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2_1
Muthmainnah, Johar, R., & Anwar. (2019). Kemampuan Siswa SMP Membat Denah melalui Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) Pada Materi Perbandingan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 73–80.
OECD. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. In Talis. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-en
Puspandari, N., & Supraman. (2018). Deskripsi Multimedia Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis STEM untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA Kelas XII. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, 124–130.
Ramdhani, M. R., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2017). Student’s mathematical understanding ability based on self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012065
Rindawati, Ikhsanudin, & Wardah. (2014). An Analysis on English Textbook “Bahasa Inggris: When English Rinbgs The Bell.†Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Universitas Tanjungpura, 3(9), 1–13.
Rubenstein, R. (2013). Focused Strategies for Middle-Grades Mathematics Vocabulary Development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(4), 200–207.
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
Sidawi, M. M. (2009). Teaching Science through Designing Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9045-1
Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1).
Thompson, D. R., & Rubenstein, R. N. (2000). Learning mathematics vocabulary: Potential pitfallsand instructional strategies. Mathematics Teacher. Mathematics Teacher, 93(7), 568–574.
Universitas, H., Palembang, P., Negeri, S. M. P., Negeri, S. M. P.,
Kunci, K., Learning, D., & Belajar, H. (2019). Penerapan Discovery Learning Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik SMP Negeri 26 Palembang. Prosıdıng Semınar Nasıonal Pendıdıkan Program Pascasarjana Unıversıtas PGRI Palembang, 293–304.
Widodo, S. A. (2018). Selection of Learning Media Mathematics for Junior School Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(1), 154–160.
Wulandari, L. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Reativitas Matematis Melalui STEM Materi Koordinat Kelas VIIIA SMP Negeri 1 Magelang. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 5(1), 23–30.
Yanni, M. H. (2018). Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran TAPPS Berbasis Pendekatan (STEM). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION), 1(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v1i2.373
Young, V. M., House, A., Wang, H., Singleton, C., & Klopfenstein, K. (2011). Inclusive STEM Schools : Early Promise in Texas and Unanswered Questions. In The Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072639.pdf
Yulia, Zubainur, C. M., & Rahmah Johar. (2019). Keterlibatan Perilaku Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika melalui STEM-PjBL di SMPN 2 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 29–37.
_-_Copy.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
