INOVASI DAN KREATIVITAS PUBLIC SERVICE ERA OTONOMI DAERAH SEBAGAI MODERN LOCAL GOVERMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v4i2.11216Keywords:
Innovation, Creativity, Era of Regional Autonomy.Abstract
The implementation of public services is still going on with the old public administration practices. Therefore, it is time for the bureaucracy to change its mindset. The development of the paradigm of public administration can bring enlightenment to the bureaucracy. Public Service innovation and creativity is one of the right solutions in the era of regional autonomy in achieving the welfare of modern regional government. So that innovation and creativity are needed to translate public interest in accelerating the goal of regional autonomy, namely nation building. This study raised the formulation of the problem; (1). How is the innovation and creativity of public service in the era of regional autonomy as a modern local government? (2). What are the supporting and inhibiting factors for implementing innovation and creativity in public service in the era of regional autonomy as modern local government in Indonesia? This study was designed using qualitative methods with interactive techniques. The results of this study are expected to find new concepts that can be applied in improving public services in Indonesia, and to realize these innovations the government needs space for creativity.
References
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 Tentang Inovasi Daerah.
Agus Dwiyanto, (2006), Mewujudkan Good Geovernance Melalui Pelayanan Public, Yogyakarta; UGM Press.
Ali Farazmand, (2004), Sound Governance in the Age of Globalization: A Conceptual Frameworkâ€, dalam Ali Farazmand, Eds; Sound Governace: Policy and Administrative Innovation, (___); (___).
B. Guy Peters, (1995), The Politics of Bureaucracy, Massachusetts; Addison Wesley.
Boon Siong Neo dan Geraldine Chen, (2007), Dynamic Governance, Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore, Singapore; World Scientific Publishing.
Christopher Pollitt (1990), Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo- American Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts; Basil Blackwell.
David Osborne dan Ted Gaebler, (1992), Mewirausahakan Birokrasi : Mentransformasi Semangat Wirausaha Ke Dalam Sektor Publik, Jakarta; PPM.
Denhardt dan Denhardt, (2003), The New Public Service, Serving not Steering, New York; M.E. Sharpe, Armonk.
Keban Yeremis T, (2014), Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik, Konsep, Teori dan Isu. (___); (___).
Mifta Thoha, (2015), Ilmu Administrasi Publik Kontemporer, Jakarta; Prenadamedia Group.
Owen E. Hughes, (1994), Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Ratminto dan Atik Septi, (2005), Manajemen Pelayanan, Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.
Slamet Rosyadi, (2006), Kuncinya Melayani Masyarakat, Dalam Suara Merdeka, (___); (___).
Bhennyamin Hoessein, (2021), Hubungan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Pusat dengan Pemerintahan Daerah, Jurnal Bisnis dan Birokrasi, Vol. 1, No. 1.
C. Hood, (1991), A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, Spring, Vol. (___), No. (___).
........, (1995), The NPM in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme, Accounting, Organisation and Society, Vol. 2, No. 3.
