Policy of Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of taking another person's ideas, writings, data, or work (or their own previously published work) and presenting them as one's own new work without providing proper and clear attribution or acknowledgement. Plagiarism is not just a copyright violation, but a serious violation of academic ethics and integrity.
1Forms of Plagiarism
2Similarity Index vs Plagiarism
The percentage figure on the scanner is a maximum of 20%), but this is not a single indicator of plagiarism. A low similarity score can still be considered plagiarism if the copied part is the core idea of the manuscript, on the other hand, a rather high score is not necessarily plagiarism if it is only the name of an official document or an indexed reference.
3Detection and Procedure for Handling Plagiarism Indications
Yurispruden screens the manuscript with the similarity check Turnitin similarity scanner, if plagiarism is indicated, Yurispruden will take the following steps:
4Handling of Manuscripts Proven to Plagiarism Before Publication
The author revises the manuscript or the manuscript is rejected directly if the author does not revise minor plagiarism within the time limit to be determined by the editor or proves to be medium and severe plagiarism.
5Handling of Manuscripts Proven to Plagiarism After Publication
If the author's explanation is acceptable and it is proven that the similarity is accidental/minor, the publisher will not retract the article. The issuer only attaches an official Notice of Correction containing:
- Missing addition of citations or references to original sources.
- Changing the phrases/sentences in the related sections so that they are no longer plagiarized.
The editor sends ethical responses to the author to be more careful in the future so as not to repeat similar mistakes.
6When Does Minor Plagiarism Turn Into Retraction?
Although the percentage of copied text is small, the Jurisprudence will consider Retraction (Article Retraction) or report to the author's institution if, the author provides an unsatisfactory explanation, is uncooperative, or deliberately lies or the minor part copied turns out to be a key finding or claims of the findings belonging to others.


