Implementing Pearson’s assessment framework in English language instruction: Insights from an Indonesian private high school

Authors

  • Leil Badrah Zaki Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Gabby Kezhiandra Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Malik Akbar Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Theodesia Lady Pratiwi Universitas Internasional Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v7i1.24603

Keywords:

assessment strategy, assignment practices, curriculum implementation, no-homework policy, Pearson curriculum, student engagement, teacher workload

Abstract

Structured assessment regimes are instrumental in influencing classroom teaching and learning. For example, an international curriculum, such as Pearson, provides structured assessment cornerstones for teaching and learning. Yet, despite Indonesian secondary schools widely adopting it, existing literature predominantly focuses on curriculum design and alignment, while the substantial issue of classroom-level impact resulting from standardized assessment demands still remains underexplored. The present paper seeks to uncover the extent to which Pearson's structured assessment requirements are realized in the classroom and how they impact teaching and learning. The qualitative case study research method was utilized through classroom observations and interviews concerning two foreign English teachers in a private secondary school in Batam, Indonesia. Results show that the Pearson assessment system, comprising mechanisms like the prohibition of homework, assessment by means of rubrics, and instant feedback, has brought in student engagement and reduced stress through steadiness and transparency in assessment. Nevertheless, strict timetables for exams and standard formats that are imposed on the teachers out of the core systems have led to a reduction of teachers' pedagogical freedom and an increase in their administrative workload. The systemic pressures, such as real-time assessment demands and rigid accountability structures, pose significant challenges, particularly in resource-constrained environments with diverse learner readiness. The study contributes to theoretical debates on standardized assessment by showing how tightly aligned frameworks compress pedagogical flexibility while demanding high instructional precision. The findings emphasize the need for more adaptable assessment frameworks that balance accountability and teacher autonomy as well as continuous student engagement.

References

Adeniran, A., Onyekwere, S. C., Okon, A., Atuhurra, J., Chaudhry, R., & Kaffenberger, M. (2023). Instructional alignment in Nigeria using the surveys of enacted curriculum. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2023/143

Bada, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of brain-based teaching strategy on students’ achievement and score levels in heat energy. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i1.45

Bezi, A., Fakoori, H., Bayani, A. A., & Saemi, H. (2024). Design and validation of an environmental education curriculum model for higher education based on the “Aker” approach. ‪Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.8 ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Coleman, P. (2021). Validity and reliability within qualitative research in the caring sciences. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 14(3), 2041-2045. https://doi.org/https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/

Creswell, W. J. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage

Du, W., & Wang, Y. (2019). Developing an outcome-based ESP course with blended-learning method for Chinese undergraduates. Creative Education, 10(8), 1834–1849. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.108132

Ibeh, I. A. (2021). Curriculum theory by Ralph Tyler and its implication for 21st century learning. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies (UNIJERPS), 52-61. https://doi.org/http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=21363

Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: principles, practices, and problems. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z

Jatmoko, D., Widiyono, Y., Hidayanto, A., & Anhar, F. N. (2023). Assessment of the implementation of independent curriculum learning in Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 6(4), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10444259

Li, Y. & Wang, L. (2018). An ethnography of Chinese college English teachers transition from teaching English for general purposes to teaching English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 6(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2018.6.1.6

Marsevani, M., Slikker, G. M., Pratiwi, T. L., & Nugraha, H. (2024). Portraying young learners’ language learning strategies: A case study from EFL teachers’ voices. Language Learning Strategies Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 383–405. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v9i2.1806

McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful Member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41–52. https://www.ajqr.org/article/meaningful-member-checking-a-structured-approach-to-member-checking-12973

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Mohammadkhah, E., Kiany, G. R., Tajeddin, Z., & ShayesteFar, P. (2022). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: A contextualized measure of assessment theories and skills. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 29, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.29.07

Ningsih, N. R., Rosidah, N. A. R., & Pradana, D. A. (2025). The role of formative assessment in developing english language curriculum and learning. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION & TEACHING (J-TECH), 1(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.62734/jtech.v1i2.417

Nägele, C., Kersh, N., & Stalder, B. E. (2023). Trends in vocational education and training research. VI. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/ze-nodo.8322300

O’Connor, E. A., Evans, C. V., Henninger, M., Redmond, N., & Senger, C. A. (2024). Interventions for weight management in children and adolescents: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. Jama, 332(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.6739

Pearson Education. (2021). Effective assignment design for the higher nationals in business: Authorised assignment briefs booklet. Pearson

Pham, T., & Pham, L. H. (2021). Implementing formative assessment in Vietnamese classrooms: Strategies to navigate cultural and structural obstacles (pp. 137–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0057-9_9

Putra, H. E., Syarif, H., & Zainil, Y. (2024). English teachers’ perception on the implementation of independent learning curriculum in elementary schools of Lima Kaum, Indonesia. 12(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v10i1.6007

Santos, L. M. D. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109

Sari, E. C. (2022). Kurikulum di Indonesia: Tinjauan perkembangan kurikulum pendidikan. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 2(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59404/ijce.v2i2.54

Stoffelsma, L., Mwinlaaru, I. N., Otchere, G., Owusu-Ansah, A. L., & Adjei J. A. (2017). Curriculum design in practice: Improving the academic reading proficiency of first year university students. Ibérica, 33, 97-124. http://www.aelfe.org/documents/33_04_IBERICA.pdf

Surul, R., & Prastowo, A. (2022). Analysis of the implementation of independent curriculum assessment assessment in English courses at elementary school. CREW Journal, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/crewjournal.v1i2.1778

Wyatt-Smith, C., Adie, L., Haynes, M., & Day, C. (2022). Professionalizing teacher education: Performance assessment, standards, moderation, and evidence. Routledge

Zaki, B. L., Tambunan, I. P. H., Anisa, Q., Pratiwi, T. L., & Balqis, N. (2024). Understanding student perspectives on ICT implementation in a public school in Batam city. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v2i1.2719

Data Coding Process from Initial Categories to Themes

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

How to Cite

Zaki, L. B., Kezhiandra, G., Akbar, M., & Pratiwi, T. L. (2026). Implementing Pearson’s assessment framework in English language instruction: Insights from an Indonesian private high school. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 7(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v7i1.24603