Implementing Pearson’s assessment framework in English language instruction: Insights from an Indonesian private high school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v7i1.24603Keywords:
assessment strategy, assignment practices, curriculum implementation, no-homework policy, Pearson curriculum, student engagement, teacher workloadAbstract
Structured assessment regimes are instrumental in influencing classroom teaching and learning. For example, an international curriculum, such as Pearson, provides structured assessment cornerstones for teaching and learning. Yet, despite Indonesian secondary schools widely adopting it, existing literature predominantly focuses on curriculum design and alignment, while the substantial issue of classroom-level impact resulting from standardized assessment demands still remains underexplored. The present paper seeks to uncover the extent to which Pearson's structured assessment requirements are realized in the classroom and how they impact teaching and learning. The qualitative case study research method was utilized through classroom observations and interviews concerning two foreign English teachers in a private secondary school in Batam, Indonesia. Results show that the Pearson assessment system, comprising mechanisms like the prohibition of homework, assessment by means of rubrics, and instant feedback, has brought in student engagement and reduced stress through steadiness and transparency in assessment. Nevertheless, strict timetables for exams and standard formats that are imposed on the teachers out of the core systems have led to a reduction of teachers' pedagogical freedom and an increase in their administrative workload. The systemic pressures, such as real-time assessment demands and rigid accountability structures, pose significant challenges, particularly in resource-constrained environments with diverse learner readiness. The study contributes to theoretical debates on standardized assessment by showing how tightly aligned frameworks compress pedagogical flexibility while demanding high instructional precision. The findings emphasize the need for more adaptable assessment frameworks that balance accountability and teacher autonomy as well as continuous student engagement.
References
Adeniran, A., Onyekwere, S. C., Okon, A., Atuhurra, J., Chaudhry, R., & Kaffenberger, M. (2023). Instructional alignment in Nigeria using the surveys of enacted curriculum. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2023/143
Bada, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of brain-based teaching strategy on students’ achievement and score levels in heat energy. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i1.45
Bezi, A., Fakoori, H., Bayani, A. A., & Saemi, H. (2024). Design and validation of an environmental education curriculum model for higher education based on the “Aker” approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.8
Coleman, P. (2021). Validity and reliability within qualitative research in the caring sciences. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 14(3), 2041-2045. https://doi.org/https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/
Creswell, W. J. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage
Du, W., & Wang, Y. (2019). Developing an outcome-based ESP course with blended-learning method for Chinese undergraduates. Creative Education, 10(8), 1834–1849. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.108132
Ibeh, I. A. (2021). Curriculum theory by Ralph Tyler and its implication for 21st century learning. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies (UNIJERPS), 52-61. https://doi.org/http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=21363
Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: principles, practices, and problems. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z
Jatmoko, D., Widiyono, Y., Hidayanto, A., & Anhar, F. N. (2023). Assessment of the implementation of independent curriculum learning in Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 6(4), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10444259
Li, Y. & Wang, L. (2018). An ethnography of Chinese college English teachers transition from teaching English for general purposes to teaching English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 6(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2018.6.1.6
Marsevani, M., Slikker, G. M., Pratiwi, T. L., & Nugraha, H. (2024). Portraying young learners’ language learning strategies: A case study from EFL teachers’ voices. Language Learning Strategies Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 383–405. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v9i2.1806
McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful Member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41–52. https://www.ajqr.org/article/meaningful-member-checking-a-structured-approach-to-member-checking-12973
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Mohammadkhah, E., Kiany, G. R., Tajeddin, Z., & ShayesteFar, P. (2022). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: A contextualized measure of assessment theories and skills. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 29, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.29.07
Ningsih, N. R., Rosidah, N. A. R., & Pradana, D. A. (2025). The role of formative assessment in developing english language curriculum and learning. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION & TEACHING (J-TECH), 1(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.62734/jtech.v1i2.417
Nägele, C., Kersh, N., & Stalder, B. E. (2023). Trends in vocational education and training research. VI. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/ze-nodo.8322300
O’Connor, E. A., Evans, C. V., Henninger, M., Redmond, N., & Senger, C. A. (2024). Interventions for weight management in children and adolescents: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. Jama, 332(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.6739
Pearson Education. (2021). Effective assignment design for the higher nationals in business: Authorised assignment briefs booklet. Pearson
Pham, T., & Pham, L. H. (2021). Implementing formative assessment in Vietnamese classrooms: Strategies to navigate cultural and structural obstacles (pp. 137–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0057-9_9
Putra, H. E., Syarif, H., & Zainil, Y. (2024). English teachers’ perception on the implementation of independent learning curriculum in elementary schools of Lima Kaum, Indonesia. 12(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v10i1.6007
Santos, L. M. D. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109
Sari, E. C. (2022). Kurikulum di Indonesia: Tinjauan perkembangan kurikulum pendidikan. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 2(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59404/ijce.v2i2.54
Stoffelsma, L., Mwinlaaru, I. N., Otchere, G., Owusu-Ansah, A. L., & Adjei J. A. (2017). Curriculum design in practice: Improving the academic reading proficiency of first year university students. Ibérica, 33, 97-124. http://www.aelfe.org/documents/33_04_IBERICA.pdf
Surul, R., & Prastowo, A. (2022). Analysis of the implementation of independent curriculum assessment assessment in English courses at elementary school. CREW Journal, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/crewjournal.v1i2.1778
Wyatt-Smith, C., Adie, L., Haynes, M., & Day, C. (2022). Professionalizing teacher education: Performance assessment, standards, moderation, and evidence. Routledge
Zaki, B. L., Tambunan, I. P. H., Anisa, Q., Pratiwi, T. L., & Balqis, N. (2024). Understanding student perspectives on ICT implementation in a public school in Batam city. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v2i1.2719
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leil Badrah Zaki, Gabby Kezhiandra, Malik Akbar, Theodesia Lady Pratiwi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.




















