Pemidanaan Kerja Sosial Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i1.16915Keywords:
Punishment, Social Work, Traffic, Protection of Human RightsAbstract
The main punishment that is always formulated as a criminal threat for all types crimes, such as traffic accidents due to negligence, is imprisonment, although in its own development it is considered ineffective in realizing the goals of punishment. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Social work punishment is an effective alternative punishment to make the perpetrators of a crime deterrent, which will not only provide legal certainty but also a sense of justice and benefit for both perpetrators and victims. Thus, the imposition of social work punishment is used as a form of protection for the human rights possessed by perpetrators, especially in traffic accident crimes due to negligence. Therefore, the final results of this study formulate social work punishment for perpetrators of traffic accident crimes due to negligence which is very appropriate when associated with criminal law reform.
References
Agung Kurniawan, (18 Januari 2019), Jumlah Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas di Indonesia Harus Turun, Diakses pada 3 Juli 2019, Dari Kompas: https://otomotif.kompas.com/read/2019/01/18/082200615/jumlah-korban-kecelakaan-lalu-lintas-di-indonesia-harus-turun.
Agus Raharjo, (Januari, 2008), Problematika Asas Retroaktif dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 1.
Alan Norrie, (1992), Subjectivism, Objectivism and the Limits of Criminal Recklessness, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 12, Issue 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/12.1.45.
Anonim, (22 Agustus 2017), Rata-rata Tiga Orang Meninggal Setiap Jam Akibat Kecelakaan Jalan, Diakses pada 3 Juli 2019, Dari Kominfo: https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/10368/rata-rata-tiga-orang-meninggal-setiap-jam-akibat-kecelakaan-jalan/0/artikelgpr.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, (2015), Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Bambang Waluyo, (2002), Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief, (2006), Hukum Pidana Inggris, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
_____, (2007), Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Korban dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Brandon J. Broderick, (18 Februari 2022), Negligent Driving vs Careless Driving vs Reckless Driving: What's the Difference?. Diakses pada 28 Desember 2022, Dari Brandonjbroderick: https://www.brandonjbroderick.com/negligent-driving-vs-careless-driving-vs-reckless-driving-whats-difference.
Edi As’Adi, (2014), Problematika Penerapan Asas Recklessness dalam Prespektif Pembaharuan Hukum Lalu Lintas di Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 13, Nomor 2.
Galih Puji Mulyono dan Barda Nawawi Arief (2016), Upaya Mengurangi Kepadatan Narapidana Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia, Jurnal Law Reform, Volume 12, Nomor 1.
Iskandar Wibawa, (Desember, 2017), Pidana Kerja Sosial Dan Restitusi Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 24, Nomor 2.
Kurnisar, (Juni, 2020), Pancasila Sumber Dari Segala Sumber Hukum Di Indonesia, Media Komunikasi FPIPS, Volume 10, Nomor 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/mkfis.v10i2.467.
Peter Madmud Marzuki, (2007), Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Galih Puji Mulyono, Latifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
