Apostasy As Grounds for Divorce by Talak Raj’i (Study of Decision No. 541/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Bjb)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v9i1.24574Keywords:
Apostasy, Divorce, Talak Raj'iAbstract
Religious differences in marriage raise legal issues, especially when one party leaves Islam (apostasy), which affects the validity of the marriage. This study aims to analyze the basis of the judge's considerations and the legal consequences of applying talak raj’i in divorce cases due to apostasy as stated in the Banjarbaru Religious Court Decision Number 541/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bjb. The method used is normative legal research with a case approach through analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the judge imposed talak raj’i based on the grounds of continuous disputes in accordance with positive law, even though according to Sharia law, the marriage relationship had been invalid since the occurrence of religious differences. In this case, the right of rujuk and nafkah Iddah cannot be enforced because the marriage bond has been severed according to Sharia law.
References
Affan, Moh Sa’i, dan Holil Holil. “Analisis Tentang Status Anak Pada Pasangan Murtad Perspektif UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 Dan Mazhab Syafi’i.” Al-Muqaranah: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55210/jpmh.v3i1.509.
Ahmad, Ahmad Fauzi, Taufiq Taufiq Ikram Ash Syidiqi, Peni Alyanita, dan Yogi Sopian Haris. “Rekonstruksi Hukum Keluarga Islam Dalam Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Upaya Preventif Pernikahan Dini Di Indonesia.” USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 4 (2025): 455–74. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v6i4.2528.
Asy-Syafi’i, Muhammad bin Idris. Al-Umm Juz 9. Disunting oleh Terjemah. Misbah. Pustaka Azzam, 2014.
Azizah, Laila, dan Anwar Hafidzi. “Hak dan Kewajiban Suami-Istri, Harta Bersama, Serta Akibat Hukum Perceraian.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory 3, no. 2 (2025): 1735–41. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1164.
Cahyani, Andi Intan. “Peradilan Agama sebagai Penegak Hukum Islam di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 1 (2019): 98–116. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i1.9483.
Darmawan, Bagus Ary, M. Reza Saputra, dan Jaenal Aripin. “Analisis Hak Asuh Anak Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Lahat Nomor 685/Pdt.G/2022/PA.LT: Perspektif Maqâsid Al-Syarî’ah Muhammad Thâhir Ibn Âsyûr.” Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi 1, no. 4 (2024): 319–35. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.297.
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Putusan Nomor 541/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bjb,.” Preprint, 2020.
Fadhilah, Nur, Ahmad Musonnif, dan Indri Hadisiswati. “Regulating Arbitrary Divorce in Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah–Based Comparative Analysis of Muslim-Majority Legal Systems.” Al-Hukama’: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 15, no. 2 (2025): 149–75. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.
Faisal, Raja, Muhammad Fahmi Syafi’uddin, dan Abbas Arfan. “Putusnya Perkawinan (Perspektif Perbandingan Empat Madzhab Fikih).” Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Law 2, no. 1 (2025): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.54622/ijsl.v2i1.419.
Farah, Naila, Musahwi Musahwi, dan Muhamad Ridho Hidayatullah. “Kekerasan berbasis gender dalam kasus perceraian pada masa pandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Cirebon.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak 18, no. 2 (2023): 177–96. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v18i2.9188.
Hasymi Hadromi, Muhamad. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Perceraian Akibat Murtad Di Pengadilan Agama Bogor (Putusan Nomor 1151/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bgr).” Diploma, UNUSIA, 2024. https://unusia.ac.id/prodi/s1hukumkeluarga.
Ilyasa, Faisal Fauzan, Muhammad Nurfaizi Arya Rahardja, Akhmad Rudi Masrukhin, Mailinda Anis Zulaiha, dan Elan Sumarna. “Keutamaan Ibu Dalam Hak Asuh Anak Perspektif Pendidikan: Analisis Hadits Tarbawi.” Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 22, no. 1 (2025): 90–104. https://doi.org/10.25299/ajaip.2025.vol22(1).15850.
Irawan Rangkuti, Chairil, Sukiati Sukiati, dan Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar. “The Concept Of Maqashid Sharia In The Effectiveness Of The Implementation Of Presidential Regulation No. 72 Of 2021 Concerning The Handling Of Stunting Mandailing Natal Regency.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 4, no. 5 (2024): 1404–17. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.526.
Irwansyah, Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi). Vol. 3. 5. Mira Buana Media, 2022.
Jafar, M. “Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Asuh Anak (Hadhanah) Setelah Perceraian Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam: (Studi Putusan Nomor 567/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Clg).” Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2024): 28–54. https://doi.org/10.56211/rechtsnormen.v3i1.625.
Jauhari, Jauhari. “Penerapan Prinsip Maqashid Syariah Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Karimiyah 4, no. 1 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.59623/karimiyah.v4i1.49.
Muhsin, M, dan Soleh Hasan Wahid. “Talak di Luar Pengadilan Perspektif Fikih dan Hukum Positif.” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies 3, no. 1 (2021): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v3i1.3063.
Mukdin, Khairani, Rahmil Izzati, dan Syuhada Syuhada. “The Validity Of Reconciliation Without Witnesses At The Religious Affairs Office.” El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law 3, no. 1 (2023): 126–52. https://doi.org/10.22373/hadhanah.v3i1.2725.
Nasution, Muhammad Idris. “Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Agung Dan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penerapan Fasakh Terhadap Perceraian Atas Dasar Murtad.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4, no. 2 (2021): 370–86. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v4i2.10015.
Nurhidayati, Efita, dan Miftakhul Huda. “Perspektif Murtad Dalam Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Positif Islam Dan Fikih 4 Imam Mazhab.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) 7, no. 02 (2025): 988–99. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v7i02.12702.
Riftiani, Aulia Nur. “Analisis Terhadap Pendapat Imam Asy-Syafi’i Tentang Perkawinan Yang Salah Satu Pasangan Murtad.” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, 2019.
Saputra, Deris Arista. “A Study of Fasakh and Khulu in The Compilation of Islamic Law (Khi): Comparison, Causes, and Implications.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 5, no. 1 (2025): 136–43. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i1.1191.
Saputra, Maulana Adi, Silvia Widyawati, Razi Ardiyanto, Novia Pitriana, dan Agil Gilang Ramadhan. “Kompleksitas Perceraian Akibat Murtad: Analisis Peran Pengadilan Agama Dalam Konteks Hukum Islam.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 1, no. 3 (2024): 129–40. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.2239.
Sbarra, David A., dan Mark A. Whisman. “Divorce, health, and socioeconomic status: An agenda for psychological science.” Current Opinion in Psychology 43 (Februari 2022): 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.007.
Shofi, Muhammad Aminuddin. “Marriage and Religion: Dynamics of Religious Conversion in Marriage and The Advancement of Community Religious Life Perspective of Religious Psychology and Sociology (Study in Lumajang Regency).” Dialog 44, no. 1 (2021): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v44i1.422.
Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Johan Wahyudi, dan Razky Akbar. “Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono.” Yuridika 29, no. 1 (2014): 100–114. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i1.360.
Sugitanata, Arif, dan Suud Sarim Karimullah. “Implemetasi Hukum Keluarga Islam Pada Undang-Undang Perkawinan Di Indonesia Mengenai Hak Memilih Pasangan Bagi Perempuan.” SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak 5, no. 01 (2023): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32332/jsga.v5i01.6536.
Sumarta, Sumarta, Burhandin Burhanudin, dan Tenda Budiyanto. “Maqasid Al-Syariah Mendorong Keadilan Dan Keseimbangan Dalam Hukum Islam.” Khulasah : Islamic Studies Journal 6, no. 1 (2024): 16–31. https://doi.org/10.55656/kisj.v6i1.120.
Thorik, Achmad, Sayehu Sayehu, Muhammad Iqbal Sugandi, dan Fikri Prasetya. “Dinamika Perceraian di Kalangan Keluarga Muslim Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Islam.” Millatuna: Jurnal Studi Islam 2, no. 04 (2025): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.33752/mjsi.v2i04.11154.
Ulya, Fawzia Hidayatul, Fashi Hatul Lisaniyah, dan Mu’amaroh Mu’amaroh. “Penguasaan Hak Asuh Anak di bawah Umur kepada Bapak.” The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law 2, no. 1 (2021): 101–17. https://doi.org/10.51675/jaksya.v2i1.176.
Wati, Reka Desrina. “The Marriage Agreement in Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 Is Reviewed According to Islamic Law.” Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2022): 178–88. https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v7i2.4125.
Willya, Evra, Nurlaila Harun, dan Afni Anom. “Lawsuits Related to Divorce Due to Apostasy in Bitung Religious Court.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 46, no. 1 (2022): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v46i1.877.
Willya, Evra, Nurlaila Harun, dan Afni Anom. “Lawsuits Related To Divorce Due To Apostasy In Bitung Religious Court.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 46, no. 1 (2022): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v46i1.877.
Wiranto, Faisar Ananda Arfa, dan Ibnu Radwan Siddiq Turnip. “Perceraian Dan Hak Hak Pasca Perceraian Dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam.” Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi 2, no. 6 (2025): 494–508. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i6.507.
Wulandari, Ayu, dan Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna. “Problematika Penerapan Prinsip Due Process of Law Dalam Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora 2, no. 2 (2025): 52–63. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.1613.
Yuniria, Marice, Syahrial Dedi, dan Jumira Warlizasusi. “Implementasi Ikrar Sighat Taklik Talak Dalam Membentuk Keluarga Sakinah Mawaddah Wa Rahmah.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 16, no. 5 (2022): 1779–86. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v16i5.1228.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadya Nurul Ilma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication and dissemination of the article is subject to an attribution license (CC BY) under the Creative Commons Attribution License, so that others free also to copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon material for any purpose, even commercially, as long as they give credit to the author for the authentic work.
