Structured or emotion? Teacher and student perceptions of genre-based vs. multisensory pedagogies in EFL writing classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v6i2.23763Keywords:
academic writing, EFL teacher education, multisensory learning, online learning, genre-based approach, systemic functional linguisticsAbstract
This study explores the effectiveness of two pedagogical approaches—genre-based (grounded in systemic functional linguistics, SFL) and multisensory instruction—in Indonesian EFL teacher education. While the genre-based approach emphasizes structured textual analysis and explicit feedback, the multisensory method integrates auditory, visual, and emotional modalities to enhance engagement. Through qualitative phenomenological analysis, including interviews and reflective journals from six students and two lecturers, the study examines perceptions of support, engagement, and skill development. Findings reveal that the genre-based approach improved grammatical precision and reduced reliance on translation tools but often led to passive learning and limited metacognitive awareness. Conversely, the multisensory approach fostered emotional-text connections and autonomous learning through techniques like the reading for emotion method (REM) and verbotonal exercises, though repetitive tasks occasionally caused fatigue. Lecturers noted that while SFL strengthened structural competence, it struggled to cultivate creativity, whereas multisensory methods enhanced engagement but required a better balance between autonomy and guidance. Theoretical implications highlight the value of integrating neuroscientific principles with sociocultural learning theories to optimize writing instruction. The study advocates for a hybrid model that combines the scaffolding benefits of genre-based pedagogy with the motivational and cognitive advantages of multisensory techniques. Recommendations include diversifying tasks to sustain engagement, reducing over-reliance on translation tools, and fostering metacognitive reflection. Future research should investigate longitudinal impacts and ideal sensory-structural balances to enhance EFL writing instruction in similar contexts.
References
Abakah, E. (2023). Teacher learning from continuing professional development (CPD) participation: A sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDRO.2023.100242
Afifi, N. (2020). Introducing genre-based pedagogy to the teaching of literature reviews in an Indonesian EFL context [Macquarie University]. Retrieved from https://figshare.mq.edu.au/ndownloader/files/42125451
Arisandy, F. (2024). Dealing with difficult large classes in ELT contexts. In O. Effiong, B. Batziakas, & K. Ben Abbes (Eds.), Hybrid learning in English language teaching: Motivation, challenges and opportunities (pp. 225–241). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Arksey, H. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. In H. Arksey & P. T. Knight (Eds.), Interviewing for Social Scientists (pp. 1–224). New York: Sage Publisher.
Baehaqi, L. (2023). Supporting academic writing skills of pre-service english language teachers in indonesia in an online learning environment: A multisensory approach [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Charles Darwin University.
Berninger, V. W., Winn, W. D., Stock, P., Abbott, R. D., Eschen, K., Lin, S. J., … Nagy, W. (2008). Tier 3 specialized writing instruction for students with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-007-9066-X
Bloomberg, L. D. (2023). A conceptual framework for multimodal engagement in online higher education. Journal of Online Graduate Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7858922
Brisk, M. E. (2014). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for K-5 Classrooms. Engaging Students in Academic Literacies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317816164
Cai, X., Lian, A., Puakpong, N., Shi, Y., Chen, H., Zeng, Y., … Mo, Y. (2021). Optimizing auditory input for foreign language learners through a verbotonal-based dichotic listening approach. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40862-021-00119-0
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_1
Coyle, D. (2015). Strengthening integrated learning: Towards a new era for pluriliteracies and intercultural learning. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.5294/5915
Crawford-Garrett, K., Anderson, S., Grayson, A., & Suter, C. (2015). Transformational practice: critical teacher research in pre-service teacher education. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1019902
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Edition). Sage Publications.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2018). Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies (M. J. Curry & T. Lillis, Eds.). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GMJ2DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1998&dq=The+stakes+have+only+risen+with+the+growing+emphasis+on+English-medium+instruction+and+international+academic+publishing+(Curry+%26+Lillis,+2018).&ots=ikfEp8bbuk&sig=GAzSUgwsXJuy3iM64WXVfqSopxE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., Castro-Caldas, A., & Ferro, J. M. (1976). Dichotic listening pattern in relation to interhemispheric disconnexion. Neuropsychologia, 14(2), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90055-5
Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1992). Brain and language. Scientific American, 267(3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICAN0992-88
Damasio, A. R. (1999). How the brain creates the mind. Scientific American, 281(6), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICAN1299-112
Danesi, M. (2003). Second language teaching: A view from the right side of the brain. Springer Science & Business Media.
Derewianka, B. (2015). The contribution of genre theory to literacy education in Australia. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers
Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-7
Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia [The University of Melbourne]. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/105635552/81416_1234.pdf
Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary efl writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Freadman, A. (1988). Untitled: (On genre). Cultural Studies, 2(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502388800490041
Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis?[in:] Genre and the new rhetoric. P. Medway.
Freadman, A. (2002). The invention of genres. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 29(2–3), 343–376.
Freadman, A. (2012). The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/APPLIN/AMS050
Gibbons, P. (2012). Scaffolding academic language and literacy with school-aged English language learners. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 1(2), 51–64.
Guberina, P, & Asp, C. (1981). The verbo-tonal method for rehabilitating people with communication problems. Monograph 13, World Rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://www.hsfweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Guberina_Asp-paper_Verbotonal-Method.pdf
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). Language theory and translation practice. In Rivista internazionale di tecnica della traduzione n°0, Udine, Campanotto Editore (pp. 15-25)
Hammond, R. M. (1990). The affective filter and pronunciation proficiency — attitudes and variables in second language acquisition. Language Proficiency, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0870-4_6
Harvey, L. (1996). Transfer of declarative knowledge in complex information-processing domains. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1101_3
Huebner, T. A. (2010). Differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 67(5), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639987-26
Hyland, K. (2002). 6. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000065
Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.05.002
Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-228X.2007.00004.X
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011). Implications of affective and social neuroscience for educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-5812.2010.00713.X
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Christodoulou, J. A., & Singh, V. (2012). Rest is not idleness: Implications of the brain’s default mode for human development and education. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447308
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_suppl), 344S-367S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669780
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2011). Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural theoretical perspective on teacher professional development. Routledge
Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In James, P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133–153). Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. K. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1991. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Kvale, S. (2007). Contradictions of assessment for learning in institutions of higher learning. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309-13
Lantolf, J. P., & Esteve, O. (2019). Concept-based instruction for concept-based instruction: A model for language teacher education. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language education (Vol. 1). Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002646
Lian, A. B. (2014). “New Learning” and CALL: a DIY paradigm. AsiaCALL OnLine Journal, 9, A14–A26. Retrieved from http://asiacall.info/acoj/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Lian_AB_ACOJv09_final.pdf
Lian, A. (2017). Reading for emotion with ICT tools. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education (Internationally Refereed Proceedings). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Lian, A. (2020). What axioms inform your research? Dialogizing for innovation in English language and literacy pedagogy. 394(Icirad 2019), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200115.073
Lian, A., & Norman, A. (2017). A dialog, evidence-based framework for intergrating technology into school curricula. In A. Lian, P. Kell, P. Black, & K. Y. Lie (Eds.), Challenges in global learning: dealing with education issues from an international perspective (1st ed., pp. 314-349). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lian, A., & Pertiwi, W. H. S. (2017). Theorising for innovation: Implications for English language teacher education. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-01
Lian, A., & Sussex, R. (2018). Toward a critical epistemology for learning languages and cultures in twenty-first century Asia. Multilingual Education, 24, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69995-0_3
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing Ltd
Mazandarani, O. (2022). Philosophical assumptions in ELT research: A systematic review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40299-021-00554-0
Miesel, J. A. (1991). A phenomenological exploration of the experience of voluntarily changing one’s career during midlife [The Union Institute]. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/0b810f5bbf91617173f549ac646864d2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nijakowska, J. (2013). Multisensory structured learning approach in teaching foreign languages to dyslexic learners. Second Language Learning and Teaching, 16, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00044-2_14
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336
Park, Y., Xu, Y., Collins, P., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Scaffolding learning of language structures with visual-syntactic text formatting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1896–1912. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12689
Pathak, A., & Intratat, C. (2018). Use of semi-structured interviews to investigate teacher perceptions of student collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(1), 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.business.dk/oekonomi/oekonomer-med-klar-melding-ingen-rentestigning-i-2018
Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory. In B. Inhelder, H. Chipman, & C. Zwingmann (Eds.), Piaget and His School. Springer Study Edition.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers, D. (2008). I see, but I don’t know. Scientific American Mind, 19(6), 20–23.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (2010). Reading between the lines. Scientific American Mind, 21(4), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICANMIND0910-18
Rose, D. & M. J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Equinox Publishing.
Ryan, M. (2011). Spaces of possibility in pre-service teacher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(6), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.614745
Sabarun, S., Widiati, U., Suryati, N., & Azman, M. N. A. (2023). Measuring the effect of learning style preference on learners’ argumentative essay writing across different writing strategies. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(5), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.33423/JHETP.V23I5.5935
Salomone, R. (2015). The rise of global English: Challenges for English-medium instruction and language rights. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/LPLP.39.3.03SAL
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/APPLIN/11.2.129
Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learner: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. University of Hawaii.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2008.07.006
Soliman, M. S., & Al-Madani, F. M. (2017). The effects of multisensory-based instruction combined with brain-compatible environment techniques on reading fluency and reading comprehension of fourth-grade students with dyslexia. Croatian Journal of Education : Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 19(2), 363–397. https://doi.org/10.15516/CJE.V19I2.2190
Sudimantara, L. B. (2021). Transformative learning and student agency in academic writing in undergraduate English language teacher education degree programs in Indonesia [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Charles Darwin University.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/416471
Tannehill, D., & MacPhail, A. (2014). What examining teaching metaphors tells us about pre-service teachers’ developing beliefs about teaching and learning. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.732056
Tardy, C. M. (2025). Teaching second language academic writing. Elements in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009638326
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated instruction. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education considering multiple perspectives (2nd Edition, pp. 1–576). Routledge.
Ullman, M. T., & Pullman, M. Y. (2015). A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2015.01.008
Waite-Stupiansky, S. (2022). Jean Piaget’s constructivist theory of learning. Theories of Early Childhood Education: Developmental, Behaviorist, and Critical, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003288077-2
Ware, P., Liaw, M.-L., & Warschauer, M. (2012). The use of digital media in teaching English as an international language. In Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language (1st Edition). Routledge.
Webster, R. (2016). Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1319–1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.994533
Yang, Y., Wannaruk, A., & Lian, A.-P. (2017). Improving the English-speaking skills of Chinese primary EFL learners with a verbotonal approach. Rangsit Journal of Arts and Sciences, 7(2), 141–156. Retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JCST/article/view/499
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luqman Baehaqi, Ania Lian, Lala Bumela Sudimantara, M. Zaini Miftah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
