Legitimasi Hukum Asing Sebagai Pertimbangan Putusan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Afrika Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i2.21634Kata Kunci:
Hukum Asing, Indonesia, Pertimbangan Hukum, Afrika SelatanAbstrak
Isu merujuk pada hukum asing dalam pertimbangan konstitusional sering memicu kritik sebagai “cherry picking”. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dan Afrika Selatan menggunakan hukum asing dalam yurisprudensi mereka, dengan fokus pada legitimasi dan dampaknya terhadap perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif, perundang-undangan, dan historis dengan menganalisis putusan-putusan dari kedua pengadilan serta sumber-sumber sekunder yang relevan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kedua pengadilan tersebut menggunakan hukum asing tetapi berbeda secara signifikan dalam pendekatannya. Mahkamah Konstitusi Afrika Selatan sering mengutip preseden asing secara langsung, sementara Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia lebih sering menggunakan hukum internasional sebagai referensi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan hukum asing oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat meningkatkan yurisprudensi hak asasi manusia dan demokrasi jika diintegrasikan dengan baik ke dalam kerangka hukum nasional.
Referensi
Akhmaddhian, Suwari. “Discourse on Creating a Special Environmental Court in Indonesia to Resolve Environmental Disputes.” BESTUUR 8, no. 2 (30 Desember 2020): 129–38. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.42774.
Anderson, Gary, dan Kathryn Herr. Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. 3 vol. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956215.
Armaly, Miles T., dan Adam M. Enders. “Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 75, no. 2 (1 Juni 2022): 409–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211006196.
Bar, Christian von, dan Jason Grant Allen. “Absolute Rights in Assets.” Dalam Foundations of Property Law: Things as Objects of Property Rights, disunting oleh Christian von Bar dan Jason Grant Allen, 25–92. Oxford University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198885337.003.0002.
Bisma, Putu Ari Sugiarto, Deli Bunga Saravistha, dan Ni Luh Ketut Dewi Yani Putri. “Hermeutika Majelis Hakim Terkait Ratio Decidenci: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 172/Pdt/2019/PT DPS).” AL-DALIL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Hukum 1, no. 2 (28 Juni 2023): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.58707/aldalil.v1i2.476.
Cc, Gracehaven Industries. “In The High Court Of South Africa Durban And Coast Local Division Den Braven S.A (PTY) Limited,” t.t. Diakses 27 Mei 2024.
Chanock, Martin. The Making of South African legal Culture 1902-1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice. England: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
De Gregorio, Giovanni. “The Rise of Digital Constitutionalism in the European Union.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 19, no. 1 (7 Juni 2021): 41–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab001.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Dimensions of Judicial Activism in the Constitutional Court Decisions).” SSRN Electronic Journal 13, no. 2 (Juni 2016): 406–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847500.
Graham, Matthew, dan Christopher Fevre. “‘Mandela’s out so Apartheid Has Finished’: The British Anti-Apartheid Movement and South Africa’s Transition to Majority Rule, 1990-1994.” Contemporary British History 36, no. 3 (3 Juli 2022): 323–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2021.1976154.
Hakiki, Yuniar Riza, dan Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman. “The Idea of Structuring National Legislation Based on The Ratio of Decidendi & Obiter Dictum Constitutional Court Decision: Gagasan Penataan Legislasi Nasional Berbasis Ratio Decidendi Dan Obiter Dictum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (25 Maret 2023): 78–99. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2015.
Hartman, Robert J. “Circumstantial and Constitutive Moral Luck in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” European Journal of Philosophy 32, no. 4 (2023): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12844.
Harvelian, Agnes, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, Aan Eko Widiarto, dan Indah Dwi Qurbani. “Constitutional Interpretation of Original Intent on Finding the Meaning of Social Justice in The Constitutional Review.” Yustisia 9, no. 3 (31 Desember 2020): 348–61. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.42003.
Hove, Jennifer, Lucia D’Ambruoso, Kathleen Kahn, Sophie Witter, Maria van der Merwe, Denny Mabetha, Kingsley Tembo, dan Rhian Twine. “Lessons From Community Participation in Primary Health Care and Water Resource Governance in South Africa: a Narrative Review.” Global Health Action 15, no. 1 (31 Desember 2022): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2004730.
Kahraman, Filiz, Nikhil Kalyanpur, dan Abraham L. Newman. “Domestic Curts, Transnational Law, and International Order.” European Journal of International Relations 26, no. 1 (1 September 2020): 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120938843.
Kant, Immanuel, dan Mary J. Gregor. Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Leliya, Leliya Leliya, dan Leliya Leliya. “Indonesian State Law Iin Its Historical Perspective and Development.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 23, no. 1 (19 Maret 2024): 829–45. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.4143.
Lu-Adler, Huaping. “Kant and Slavery—Or Why He Never Became a Racial Egalitarian.” Critical Philosophy of Race 10, no. 2 (1 Juli 2022): 263–94. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.10.2.0263.
Mamokhere, John, Mavhungu Musitha, dan Mmbengeni Netshidzivhani. “The Implementation of the Basic Values and Principles Governing Public Administration and Service Delivery in South Africa.” Journal of Public Affairs 22, no. 1 (8 Februari 2021): 2627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2627.
Medushevskiy, Andrei N. “Global Constitutionalism and Legal Fragmentation: The Populist Backslide in Central and Eastern Europe.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 30, no. 4 (13 Oktober 2021): 393–440. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.393-440.
Mia, Nabeelah. “The Problems with Prince : A Critical Analysis of Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince.” Constitutional Court Review 10, no. 1 (Januari 2020): 401–24. https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0015.
Murphy, Ryan H. “Breaking Wagner’s Law: Which Countries Have the Most Limited Government?” Public Finance Review 50, no. 4 (1 Juli 2022): 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221107426.
Palombo, Dalia. “Extraterritorial, Universal, or Transnational Human Rights Law?” Israel Law Review 56, no. 1 (Maret 2023): 92–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223722000139.
Park, Ji-Won, Jaeup U. Kim, Cheol-Min Ghim, dan Chae Un Kim. “The Boltzmann fair division for distributive justice.” Scientific Reports 12 (28 September 2022): 16179–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19792-3.
Rauta, Umbu, dan Ninon Melatyugra. “Hukum Internasional Sebagai Alat Interpretasi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 1 (29 Maret 2018): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1514.
Rautenbach, C. “The South African Constitutional Court’s use of foreign precedent in matters of religion: Without fear or favour?” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ) 18, no. 5 (2015): 1546–70. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i5.10.
Rautenbach, Christa. “The South African Constitutional Court’s Use of Foreign Precedent in Matters of Religion: Without Fear or Favour?” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 18, no. 5 (25 Agustus 2015). https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i5.10.
Safaat, Muchamad Ali, Aan Eko Widiarto, dan Fajar Laksono Suroso. “Pola Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Periode 2003 - 2008 Dan 2009 - 2013.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (2 November 2017): 234–61. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1421.
Scarciglia, Roberto. “Reconsidering Comparative Methodology in Administrative Law.” Beijing Law Review 10, no. 4 (5 Juli 2019): 1051–65. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2019.104056.
Siahaan, Marurar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2 ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Sinaga, Miduk, Edi Warman, dan Triono Eddy. “Kajian Hukum Model Penyelesaian Kasus Melalui Hukum Pidana Adat Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 5, no. 3 (14 Februari 2023): 2343–49. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1304.
Slaughter, Anne Marie. “A Global Community of Courts.” Harvard International Law Journal 44, no. 1 (1 Desember 2003): 191–219.
Srishyla, L. “Judicial Activism In Indian Democracy.” Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language 9, no. 47 (1 Oktober 2021): 11477–84. https://doi.org/10.21922/srjhsel.v9i47.7716.
Stoddard, Brad. “Entheogens: Psychedelic Religion in the United States, Part Two.” Religion Compass 17, no. 11 (2023): 12477. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12477.
Thomas, Kendra J., Renan Theodoro, dan Andre V Komatsu. “Socializing Justice: The Interface of Just World Beliefs and Legal Socialization.” Journal of Social Issues 77, no. 2 (2021): 314–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12442.
Wagner, Peter. “Mind the Gap(s): Moral Philosophy, International Law and Interpretative Historical Sociology.” European Journal of Social Theory 26, no. 4 (1 November 2023): 527–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231164258.
Wardhani, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya, Muhammad Dzikirullah H Noho, dan Aga Natalis. “The Adoption of Various Legal Systems in Indonesia: an Effort to Initiate The Prismatic Mixed Legal Systems.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (31 Desember 2022): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710.
Zhang, Diane. “The Use and Misuse of Foreign Materials by The Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study of Constitutional Court Decision 2003-2008.” The University of Melbourne, 2010.
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Achmad Zuhdi, Ari Ade Kamula
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
